One of the claims brought about against the Quran is the claim that it is incoherent, and the stories are scattered around. I wanted to share some notes on a few things that Nouman Ali Khan (one of the instructors at Bayyinah Institute) touched upon in this regards that I thought were absolutely beautiful. The first miracle is amazing, but the second one I mention here completely blew my mind.
Rhyming Scheme
The first miracle is regarding the rhyme scheme used in the Quran. In Surah Maryam the rhyming pattern is very distinct and consistent throughout the beginning of the Surah all the way up until the point that it begins to address Isa (alayhis Salam). After that part is finished and it starts talking about Ibrahim (alayhis Salam) it returns back to the original pattern.
Keep supporting MuslimMatters for the sake of Allah
Alhamdulillah, we're at over 850 supporters. Help us get to 900 supporters this month. All it takes is a small gift from a reader like you to keep us going, for just $2 / month.
The Prophet (SAW) has taught us the best of deeds are those that done consistently, even if they are small.
Click here to support MuslimMatters with a monthly donation of $2 per month. Set it and collect blessings from Allah (swt) for the khayr you're supporting without thinking about it.
Part of the characteristics of the Quran is that it is something meant to be recited and heard by the people. When someone is listening to this, and they notice an abrupt change they will automatically pay more attention. The rhyme scheme is not beautification only, but it serves a very real purpose in drawing attention to a very important point in the Surah.
Coherency between Surah Isra and Surah Kahf
Surah Isra and Surah Kahf are the 17th and 18th Surahs in the Quran. Isra has 111 ayaat, and Kahf has 110 ayaat.
Surah Isra begins with:
سبحان الذي أسرى بعبده
And Surah Kahf begins with:
الحمد لله الذي أنزل على عبده
Notice the similarities and differences here. Both are glorifying and praising Allah, and both are discussing revelation. In Surah Isra, the Prophet (sal-Allahu alayhi was-Sallam) is ascending up to receive the revelation, and in Surah Kahf the revelation is being sent down. Both of them have the word ‘abdihi.
In the middle of both surah’s is also an ayah talking about the story of Iblis refusing to prostrate to Adam (alayhis Salam).
In Surah Isra the ayah is as follows:
And (remember) when We said to the angels: “Prostrate unto Adam.” They prostrated except Iblis (Satan). He said: “Shall I prostrate to one whom You created from clay?”
In Surah Kahf it reads:
And (remember) when We said to the angels; “Prostrate to Adam.” So they prostrated except Iblis (Satan). He was one of the jinns; he disobeyed the Command of his Lord.
This is an example of something that some Non-Muslims may claim is an incoherency. Why is the same story split up into different places with different details? Good question.
Let’s take a quick step back. We know that Surah Isra is also sometimes called Surah Bani Israa’eel. It also contains a series of ayaat that Ibn Abbas(ra) mentioned were similar to the 10 commandments given to Musa (alayhis Salam). So this surah is primarily addressing Bani Isra’eel, who had knowledge but became arrogant.
Surah Kahf is addressing the Christians. We can see this from ayah 4, “And to warn those who say, ‘Allah has begotten a son (or offspring or children).'” The Christians disobeyed their Lord.
So when the surah is addressing those who were afflicted with arrogance, the part of the story mentioned is the one pertaining to them. When the surah is addressing a different audience, it uses the part of the story most pertinent to them. SubhanAllah!!
If that was not enough, there is still more (and this is only touching upon a small treasure of the many treasures of the Quran). The second to last ayah in each surah is,
Surah Isra:
Say (O Muhammad SAW): “Invoke Allah or invoke the Most Beneficent (Allah), by whatever name you invoke Him (it is the same), for to Him belong the Best Names
Surah Kahf:
Say (O Muhammad SAW to mankind). “If the sea were ink for (writing) the Words of my Lord, surely, the sea would be exhausted before the Words of my Lord would be finished, even if we brought (another sea) like it for its aid.”
There are 2 primary ways in which we get to know Allah (Subhanahu wa Ta’ala). First is by His Names and Attributes, and this is mentioned in Surah Isra. The other way is by recognizing Allah by His creation, and this is what is mentioned in Surah Kahf. It is amazing the way that they line up together. These 2 sets of ayaat form a foundation of Tawheed. Knowing and recognizing the Oneness of Allah(swt).
Also His Words actually are manifested in two ways, and both of these meanings are indicated in the verse from Surah Kahf:
- His Creation (as in how Allah says “kun fa yakoon” i.e. “be and it is”, so His Words are immediately apparent in Creation)
- His Revelation (as in the Qur’an itself, the literal Word of Allah)
The last ayah in each surah takes it to the next step and gives a protection from shirk. The last ayaat of each surah are as follows,
Surah Isra:
And say: “All the praises and thanks be to Allah, Who has not begotten a son (nor an offspring), and Who has no partner in (His) Dominion, nor He is low to have a Wali (helper, protector or supporter). And magnify Him with all the magnificence, [Allahu-Akbar (Allah is the Most Great)].”
Surah Kahf:
Say (O Muhammad SAW): “I am only a man like you. It has been inspired to me that your Ilah (God) is One Ilah (God i.e. Allah). So whoever hopes for the Meeting with his Lord, let him work righteousness and associate none as a partner in the worship of his Lord.”
Lastly, the last ayah of Surah Isra begins with,
وَقُلِ الْحَمْدُ لِلّهِ الَّذِي
And this is exactly what Surah Kahf begins with. When one ponders on this, it is amazing that anyone could then come and make a claim against this book, and surely had it not been from Allah we would have found within it much discrepancy, not the uncovering of gem after gem, jewel after jewel, and miracle after miracle.
*Bonus Miracle
One other thing we discussed in the class was the use of the royal We (nahnu), and proving that it is really not the plural. In the Quran, Allah refers to Himself by using, Nahnu (We), Ana (I), and the pronoun meaning He. If it was truly meant in the sense of the plural, then the pronouns referring back to Allah would also have to be in the plural, but they are not, and are in the singular.
This is just a small point that never crossed my mind before, and I find it to be a much easier (and maybe stronger) answer than trying to always explain the historical etymology of the royal we.
Also see this post: Ibaadah, Taqwa, Shukr… Mindblowing Relationship
Announcements1 month ago
Hamdi
May 25, 2007 at 3:02 PM
Jazzakum Allah khayran. This really motivates you to learn Arabic.
Muslim Apple
May 25, 2007 at 5:29 PM
I took some classes with Bayyinah Institute and Br. Nouman is an excellent teacher. He also recommended to us the book Verbal Idioms of the Quran by Mustansir Mir with many more examples of the eloquence of the Quran.
In Pursuit of Justice
May 26, 2007 at 6:18 AM
Beautiful. Even as an Arabic speaker, it is easy to read through the Quran without appreciating those gems.
ibnabeeomar
May 26, 2007 at 5:17 PM
yeah he is editing the book on idioms and it should be out soon inshallah. there are more details at bayyinah.com in their projects section.
inshallah i will be writing more about bayyinah in another upcoming post
Amatullah
May 26, 2007 at 6:51 PM
mashaAllah I agree with Muslim Apple, we took the 10 day seminar together and he is finishing up the 10 seminars now. InshaAllah next weekend is our 4th seminar. may Allah azza wa jal reward him, he is an awesome teacher mashaAllah. I always look forward to his explanation of the miracles and parables that he tells us about the Qur’an.
One parable that stuck in my mind was:
ููู ูู ููุดูุฑููู ุจูุงูููููู ููููุฃููููู ูุง ุฎูุฑูู ู ููู ุงูุณููู ูุงุก ููุชูุฎูุทููููู ุงูุทููููุฑู ุฃููู ุชูููููู ุจููู ุงูุฑูููุญู ููู ู ูููุงูู ุณูุญูููู
“…and whoever assigns partners to Allah, it is as if he had fallen from the sky, and the birds had snatched him, or the wind had thrown him to a far off place.” (ETM, 22:31)
Orientalists always have something to say about the Qur’an, one of their main arguments is that the Qur’an doesn’t have “good” parables audubillah, and they use the above ayah as evidence.
If people have taqwa Allah ta’ala will open the door to understanding for them.
The first audience of the Qur’an was the Quraysh, and they didn’t believe in the akhirah, but they believed in honor, war, wealth, glory–basically their name and status. When someone was fighting on a cliff and fell off of it, the arabs would say “he fell from the sky”–which implies two things:
1) that he was a noble warrior who lost his nobility (he fell from a high place–cliff—to a low place–the ground).
or 2) he died the death of a coward or loser (either he ran away from his enemy and fell, or lost the war). Since they didn’t believe in the hereafter, the worst thing is losing their nobility.
The second part of the ayah says, ‘and the birds had snatched him’, meaing that his corpse was abandoned–he wasn’t rememered, no one buried his body, and then the wind blows him to a far off place–he is just trash on the earth that no one cares about.
What a better way to tell the Quraysh how ugly shirk is?
SubhanAllah…if the people have taqwa, Allah will open for them a door to understanding…May Allah azza wa jal grant us understanding of His Book and allow us to implement it in our lives and make us among its companions. ameen
iram
December 1, 2017 at 9:18 AM
JazakAllah Khair Amatullah
hussain
July 28, 2007 at 8:53 PM
I have no understanding of the arabic language, but a few years ago i started listening to the quran recitation on avery regular basis, in the car , at work , at home and even reciting surahs i have memorised. but the more i listen to it the more i love it, imagine trying to listen to the same songs or poems for years sureley you would end up mad, but with the quran the more i listen the more beutifull it sounds it some times sends shivers through me by its sheer power or some times my heart melts but every time i listen only one thing comes to mind to me “NO MAN COULD EVER HAVE PRODUCED THIS” the sheer power is over whelming there are no words to describe fully the effects the quran has on the beleivers. i truly believe that if ALLAH allowed us to feel all its power our weak bodies would just give up. the quran is truly a miracle. and with that I BEAR WITNESS THAT THERE IS NOTHING WORTHY OF WORSHIP BUT ALLAH AND I BEAR WITNESS THAT MUHAMED(pbuh) IS THE MESSENGER OF ALLAH AND I BEAR WITNESS THAT THE QURAN IS TRULY THE LITERAL WORD OF ALLAH. ALL PRAISES ARE TO TO ALLAH, ALLAH IS THE SUPREME THE MOST HIGH. AND I THANK ALLAH FOR GIVING ME A SMALL ACCESS TO THE SIGNS OF THE QURAN.
Pingback: muslimmatters.org » New Guest Writer: Nouman Ali Khan!
Shibli Zaman
September 13, 2007 at 2:40 PM
[One other thing we discussed in the class was the use of the royal We (nahnu), and proving that it is really not the plural. In the Quran, Allah refers to Himself by using, Nahnu (We), Ana (I), and the pronoun meaning He. If it was truly meant in the sense of the plural, then the pronouns referring back to Allah would also have to be in the plural, but they are not, and are in the singular.
This is just a small point that never crossed my mind before, and I find it to be a much easier (and maybe stronger) answer than trying to always explain the historical etymology of the royal we.]
Just a clarification: It is not a “stronger” answer than “trying to always explain the historical etymology of the royal we”. It is a supplementary point to the indisputable fact that all Semitic religious scriptures utilize Pluralis Majestatis.
In the very first verse of the very first chapter of Genesis, the very first book of the Bible it states:
ืึผึฐืจึตืืฉืึดืืช, ืึผึธืจึธื ืึฑืึนืึดืื, ืึตืช ืึทืฉึผืึธืึทืึดื, ืึฐืึตืช ืึธืึธืจึถืฅ.
B’reshit bara Elohim et ha-Shamayim wa et ha-Aretz.
The word for God is “Elohim” and the verb for “created” is “bara” which is singular.
There are no attempts to explain this. It is an uncontested fact since time immemorial.
w-Allahu A`lam. was-salam
Pingback: muslimmatters.org » The Literary Beauty of the Qur’an
Pingback: Quranic Incoherence? 2 Miracles Respond - LI Islamic Forum
Waqar Shaikh
February 2, 2008 at 7:13 PM
Assalamu Alaykum,
Where can I buy “Verbal Idioms of the Qur’an”? I searched at Islamicbookstore.com, amazon.com, and other book stores, but I was not able to locate it.
Could you please direct me where I can get this book from?
Thank you,
ibnabeeomar
February 2, 2008 at 7:51 PM
i think its available from amazon – if its not there, i think you might have to order directly from the publisher (u. michigan if i remember right)
Dawud Israel
February 3, 2008 at 1:05 PM
This should be posted on http://www.QuranJam.com
Gohar
March 15, 2008 at 2:16 PM
Regarding the bonus miracle, is the article saying that since there is a “HE” but not a “THEY”, it proves the the WE/NAHNO genuinely is a Royal/singular ‘We’.
Muhammad
April 7, 2008 at 10:11 PM
Is brother Nauman no long blogging for Muslimmatters?…i was doing a search on the website for him and couldn’t any of the articles he had posed
Wasalamualaikum
ibnabeeomar
April 8, 2008 at 2:10 AM
he is.. wait a few days for site reorg. and you will be able to more easily find his articles inshallah
Pingback: Open Thread Sunday 6-8-08 | MuslimMatters.org
Pingback: 10 Quranic Gems from Nouman Ali Khan | MuslimMatters.org
Pingback: Divine - Linguistic Miracle of Qur'an Gems! - Page 2
Pingback: Divine - Linguistic Miracle of Qur'an Gems! - IB Islamic Forum
mohammed asif
March 10, 2011 at 12:34 PM
well its wonderful and great ,always a delight to hera something from brother nouman ,, im very very much pleased and feel honoured to hear him and at last IM PROUD VERY PROUD TO BE A MUSLIM ,, inshalllah allah subhanhutallah help one and all to get back to the rightous path and tht is the deen islam and the most glorious and undoubtly the best book frm allah QURAN sharief
AND I WOULD TO BE GLAD IF I CAN GET TO TALK TO BROTHER NOUMAN ,, INSHALLLAH SOME DAY ,,,,GREAT JOB BROTHER WISH U ALLL THE BEST AND U SUCEED AT EVERY BIT OF ATTEMPT U DO
AMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN
ALLAHAFIZ
Ale
March 12, 2016 at 12:10 PM
This was very interesting, thank you!
I am not a muslim but I have read the Qur’an in a translation for curiosity. I have some basics of Arabic but not enough to read it in Arabic.
What you wrote is an interesting and clever analysis and it gave me insight in the beauty of this text, which to be honest does not appear in a translation.
But still I do not understand what is so special and “superhuman” about the style of the Qur’an. There are hundreds or maybe thousands of writers in human history which prooved to have this level of mastering of a language (for example Shakespeare or Dante Alighieri).
Could you give me some examples of something that really could not have been written by a human?
Thank you.