An Open Letter to Sonal Shah, Member of President-Elect Obama’s Transition Advisory Board
We received the following letter in an email. Excellent initiative. Please cross-post and distribute. MuslimMatters.org has requested to be added to list of signatories.
AN OPEN LETTER TO MS. SONAL SHAH, MEMBER OF PRESIDENT-ELECT OBAMA’S TRANSITION ADVISORY BOARD
“Your recent statement on Hindu nationalist groups raises more questions than it answers.”
November 20, 2008
Dear Ms. Shah,
We are a coalition of Indian-American groups and individuals representing diverse faiths, interests, and political affiliations, who are looking forward to working with the administration of President Obama to ensure that the interests of all Indian-Americans have a place in its policies. We represent families who have grievously suffered from the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) led pogroms against Muslim minorities of Gujarat in 2002; Christians, whose communities and places of worship are under assault by VHP and its various creations for no other reason than the faith they were born in, or chose; Hindus and human rights activists who have been fighting, often at great peril to their persons, against religious bigotry and violence being fanned by the VHP, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), and their various incarnations in India as well as in the United States (the Sangh Parivar).
As you can understand, we are legitimately concerned about reports of your personal links with the VHP — whose social values, politics, and actions are antithetical to President-elect Obama’s message of hope and inclusiveness — and how those links might possibly influence your role in the transition team and the new administration’s policies towards India and Indian-Americans.
Your recent public statement, therefore, that your “personal politics have nothing in common with the views espoused by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), or any such organization” is a welcome one, and we fully expect that your actions on the transition team will be faithful to that assertion.
However, your statement does not allay all of our concerns, given the irrefutable public record of your and your family’s linkages to the VHP and other Sangh Parivar organizations, as confirmed in recent utterances by RSS circles in India and by VHP America. We would like to share those concerns with you in the hope that you will respond to them:
To begin with, like you, many of us were engaged in relief work in the aftermath of the 2001 Gujarat earthquake, when we came away with admiration for Gujarat’s civil society, despite persistent allegations that VHP and RSS were cynically using the disaster relief efforts to further their sectarian agendas. Many of us returned to Gujarat promptly in 2002 to provide relief and succor to battered Muslim (and Hindu) families, following the unprecedented violence directed against them — this time despite the openly obstructionist tactics of the Gujarat government. This period was followed by systematic intimidation of activists by the state: e.g. frivolous lawsuits against Ms. Mallika Sarabhai, a renowned artist and community activist, which prompted the Supreme Court of India to intervene on her behalf. And more recently, emboldened by their impunity in Gujarat, the Sangh Parivar has been orchestrating wide-spread violence against Christians in several BJP and BJP-partnered states of India, which has renewed the public demand for a ban on the VHP and its affiliate, the Bajrang Dal.
We remind you of this recent history to express our dismay and disappointment that at no time during this terrible period are we aware of any statement from you dissociating yourself from these dreadful acts of VHP and RSS, especially given your proximity to these organizations: As a person associated with VHP/RSS’s earthquake relief efforts in 2001, we are not aware of any acknowledgment from you of their widely reported sectarian bias in providing relief. We are not aware of any assistance from you or by IndiCorps to the thousands of families affected by the 2002 communal pogroms, nor are we aware of your speaking out against the funding of organizations implicated in these hate campaigns by charities in the United States, with some of whom you have been partnering. And, more recently, we have not heard any condemnation from you of the spate of violence against Christian Adivasis being orchestrated by VHP, for which the BJP-partnered government in Orissa has been severely indicted by India’s National Commission for Minorities.
In the face of these facts, your bold assertion that you have “always condemned any politics of division, of ethnic or religious hatred, of violence and intimidation as a political tool” is deeply troubling.
Furthermore, the revelation that you were part of the inner circle of VHP America at the time of the Gujarat earthquake indicates that your role was not confined only to humanitarian relief — an important detail that you did not address in your statement. And your consistent support for Ekal Vidyalayas (a VHP-founded movement with the major objective of countering Christianity among Adivasis), which has been found by the Human Resources Ministry of Government of India to be conditioning the minds of young children against religious minorities, adds to our fear that you have not fully distanced yourself from VHP’s intolerant, anti-minority ideology.
As you know better than most of us, President-elect Obama set a high standard of openness and personal accountability for himself during the campaign. We note from recent events that he is setting a similar standard of transparency for the transition team. In that spirit, we hope that you too will take personal responsibility for your undeniable past links with the Sangh Parivar and reconcile your recent statement against the VHP and the RSS with your silence amidst the most egregious human rights violations by them in Gujarat and elsewhere. We further hope that you will unequivocally disown and repudiate your and your family’s past and current associations with the VHP and all other Sangh Parivar organizations.
And, as a prominent Indian-American, we hope that you will join us in our call to the governments of India, Gujarat, and Orissa to speedily bring justice and rehabilitation to the thousands of victims of the Sangh Parivar’s anti-minority violence and to take immediate and effective measures to prevent such violence in the future.
These steps will lend much credence to your statement that you do not subscribe to the views of Hindu nationalist groups.
As for your comment that you have been the subject of “Ridiculous tactics of guilt by association”:
Being everyday victims of guilt by association in the US as well as in India for being Muslims, especially in Gujarat, many of us can and do recognize the insidious nature of blog postings that you may be the subject of. Others among us have been the target of preposterous accusations by supporters of VHP and RSS and have been labeled as anti-Hindu, anti-Indian, pro-terrorist, etc., for seeking justice for India’s minorities.
In contrast, your family’s connections with the Sangh Parivar have been long, deep, well documented, and presumably continue to this day. So we must respectfully reject any parallels drawn between attempts during the campaign to find President-elect Obama guilty by association and legitimate questions about your past affiliations.
In closing, the Indian and Indian-American media have widely covered your appointment to the transition team with justifiable pride, and have spoken very highly of your credentials. We join them in congratulating you and in applauding President-elect Obama for demonstrating his commitment to true diversity by appointing an Indian-American woman to his closest advisory board. We have no doubt that you will bring your expertise to bear upon the many difficult decisions that the transition team will have to make in the next few weeks. But we also sincerely hope that your actions on the team will be mindful of the welfare and aspirations of all Indians, including minority communities, which are under unprecedented attacks by Hindu nationalist groups.
We wish you all the best in your endeavors and we look forward to your response.
A Coalition of Concerned Indian-Americans
For further information on this letter, please contact:
Dr. Angana Chatterji, email@example.com, phone 415-575-6119/415-640-4013
Ravi Ravishankar, firstname.lastname@example.org, phone 503-867-0853
Dr. Shaikh Ubaid, email@example.com, phone 516-567-0783
American Muslim Physicians of Indian Origin (AMPI)
Association of Indian Muslims in America (AIM), Washington DC
Friends of South Asia (FOSA), San Jose, California (www.friendsofsouthasia.org)
India Foundation, Michigan
Indian Muslim Council (IMC), Morton Grove, Illinois (www.imc-usa.org)
Indian Muslim Education Foundation (IMEFNA), North America
International Service Society, Michigan
Non-Resident Indians for a Secular and Harmonious India (NRI-SAHI), Michigan
Sikh American Heritage Organization, Wayne, Illinois
South Asian Network for Secularism and Democracy (SANSAD), Greater Vancouver, Canada (sansad.org)
Supporters of Human Rights in India (SHRI)
The Coalition for a Secular Democratic India (CSDI), Chicago. Illinois
Vaishnava Center for Enlightenment, Michigan
Shahid Ali, M.D.
Dr. Chinmoy Banerjee
Dr. Angana Chatterji
Wasim Khan, MD, MPH
Alex V. Koshy
Kursheed A. Mallick, M.D.
Dr. Svati Shah
Dr. Hari Sharma
Dr. Shaikh Ubaid
Keep supporting MuslimMatters for the sake of Allah
Alhamdulillah, we're at over 850 supporters. Help us get to 900 supporters this month. All it takes is a small gift from a reader like you to keep us going, for just $2 / month.
The Prophet (SAW) has taught us the best of deeds are those that done consistently, even if they are small. Click here to support MuslimMatters with a monthly donation of $2 per month. Set it and collect blessings from Allah (swt) for the khayr you're supporting without thinking about it.
Leave a Reply
Welcoming Ramadan In A New Environment – Making It Feel Like ‘Home’
The MuslimMatters Ramadan Podcast Playlist 
IOK Ramadan: The People of Taqwa | Heart to Heart Ep. 2
Practical Ways To Improve Your Quran Reading. Starting This Ramadan!
IOK Ramadan: The Virtues of Reciting the Quran | Heart to Heart Ep. 1
From The Chaplain’s Desk: Engage With The Quran
Podcast | Happily Ever After (Ep 2) – What Are The Limits Of Wifely Obedience?
Breakfast With The Khans [Act Two] – Truth & Lies
[Podcast] Man 2 Man: Why Western Academics Hate Hadith
Finding Inner Peace Through Ibaadah
IOK Ramadan: The Virtues of Reciting the Quran | Heart to Heart Ep. 1
Domestic Violence Series: Marital Disputes, Ego, And Shame
The Kuwaiti Shaykh Who Told Me A Story
The Guards Who Became Muslim After Guantanamo
My Hardest Ramadan Ever
#Life6 days ago
Foster Love For The Blessed Month With These 5 Fun And Easy Ramadan Crafts For Kids
#Islam1 week ago
The Ramadan Of The Early Muslims
#Culture6 days ago
This Ramadan, Delete TikTok Before It Deletes You
#Islam2 weeks ago
[Podcast] Man 2 Man: Beast Mode – Spiritual Preparation For Ramadan
November 23, 2008 at 8:24 AM
I am not sure how effective those internet petitions are, but at least i very positive that those internet petitions create awareness among people. Is this coalition planning to make this petition online?, in that case they can get more signatures and awareness. Also, this would send a strong message/condemnation to Sangh parivars and its affiliations as well.
How would one can add his/her signature?
abu abdAllah, the Houstonian
November 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM
bismillah. i would be surprised if this kind of letter yields positive results. since there are no hard proofs in it that this woman by her actions or words ever directly supported any act which she claims to have condemned, all the letter does is make her look like a besieged member of the transition team. given her credentials at Indicorps and Google.Org, and her time served on the Transition Team, the letter probably positions her as someone that President-elect Obama would rally to support.
why? african american leadership did not want to embrace Obama when he began either of his meteoric rises towards his current post. so he will probably embrace “one of his own” who is being undercut by “leaders of her own ethnicity.” and to the extent that the transition team has been getting any great volume of mail supporting her, from people who have no title under their name, that volume of mail will look to Obama much like the everyman-support that propelled his own campaigns.
why#2? the scoreboard. she’s offered a denial, and the only reply has been more associations, reproof for non-statements, and inferences. not hard proof. if she has any political savvy, she can explain her associations deftly.
why#3? the strategy of making inferences based on what-she-has-not-said or whom-she-has-not-condemned. gee (as in gee whiz). does that sound like the GOP attacks on Obama for being a member of hateful church? the parishioner of someone who said hateful things about America? before you start posting comments like “Obama did distance himself from that priest” — ask yourself the only important question: will he feel more or less sympathy for someone caught up in a similar “smear?”
one memo. one e-mail. one letter. one taped address. one photograph. one recorded phone call. those would be the kinds of evidence that would make this letter effective.
i have no idea if such evidence exists, but without it the letter will likely only make the transition team circle the wagons.
November 23, 2008 at 4:32 PM
Nice! I hope you sign Muslimmatters! tell zaytuna.. send a copy to change.gov also!
November 23, 2008 at 10:58 PM
this is a really good petition masha’Allah…….deserves a cross post….
Pingback: An Open Letter to Sonal Shah, Member of President-Elect Obama’s Transition Advisory Board « IBN AL HYDERABADEE
November 24, 2008 at 1:00 AM
go sonal go.
November 25, 2008 at 2:35 PM
Vigilantism by all the endorsers of this letters is to put Sonal Shah and her family in the defensive. Keeping people on check is good.
But this seems to be in the similar vein as ‘McCarthyism’.
My question is would anyone in this group apply the same kind of vigilantism towards the feudalism of Rajiv Gandhi’s family. Rajiv Gandhi (leader of Congress Party in 1984) oversaw anti-Sikh crimes committed by the Congress Party against the Sikhs. If the same logic of family connection is applied – where would that place Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi?
P.S to Muslim matters: I don’t expect this comment to be posted.
November 25, 2008 at 4:28 PM
Where is your proof that Rajiv Gandhi oversaw the riots. At that time he was not even in the politics per say. Secondly didn’t you read the news in which Rahul Gandhi has called the anti-sikh riots as crimes and the accused to be punished. Where has Sonal Shah denounced such things.? Prove to me that Rajiv Gandhi oversaw the anti-sikh riots or was involved in it.
Also Congress as a party never endrosed idea of rioting and exterminating sikhs or any other minority. There platform is very clear even if they do things in secret. I am not defending the Congress here but your way of defending Sonal Shah My Forreal is pathetic and idiotic at best. VHP and there cronies have a clear anti minority agenda which is clear to anybody who have a good vision and sound mind. You cannot fool people by your clumsy arguments.
November 26, 2008 at 4:15 PM
Suhail, I won’t insult or question your intelligence.
See, how you defend (Rajiv Gandhi’s family), when it is something you care about. Several several thousands of our people were killed and hurt in 1984 and Rajiv Gandhi’s lame excuse was “When a giant tree falls, the earth shakes”. (I have nothing against Rajiv Gandhi. I am trying to draw a comparison to a similar issue here. Rahul Gandhi has not apologized either. He is trying to save his future in politics and win votes.)
As a family which has consistently been in power – more fingers can be pointed out at Sonia and Rahul via family connection (much more than that of Sonal Shah).
Angana Chatterji and the Indian groups are judging and trying Sonal Shah through innuendo and insinuation. There is a fine line that they are crossing here. This is McCarthyism. That is Angana Chatterji’s politics. But that doesn’t make it right.
December 7, 2008 at 1:25 PM
What a joke.
December 11, 2008 at 4:57 AM