Connect with us

Politics

Welcome Kosova!

Avatar

Published

on

Congratulations to our Muslim brothers and sisters in Kosova, which has just declared its independence from Serbia on Sunday (2/17/2008). As might be expected, this is not without international controversy, as Kosova’s independence has been opposed by Serbia, Russia, and other neighboring states. However, with recognition from the US and much of the EU, Kosova, despite the displeasure of its enemies, is here to stay, inshaAllah.

see:

BBC, CNN, Time, CNN.

We here at MM welcome Kosova to the international community. May Allah grant this new government the wisdom and ability to rule by the most just of legal systems, the Shari’ah, and allow it to, in doing so, become a shining example for our Ummah to follow. Ameen.

32 Comments

32 Comments

  1. Amad

    Amad

    February 19, 2008 at 12:35 AM

    mabrook to our brothers and sisters, who escaped the barbarism and hatred of the Serbs to rule their own destiny.

  2. AnonyMouse

    AnonyMouse

    February 19, 2008 at 12:49 AM

    May Allah grant our brothers and sisters the strength of emaan, the patience, the knowledge, wisdom, understanding, and guidance to rule their country successfully according to Islam, ameen!

  3. Avatar

    Nadia

    February 19, 2008 at 1:09 AM

    Alhamdulillah this is great news! May Allah allow them to live peacefully in their country and relish their independance while remaining steadfast on their deen.

  4. Avatar

    theManOfFewWords

    February 19, 2008 at 1:44 AM

    Brothers and sisters, be very careful regarding the independence of Kosova. The idea of an independent Muslim state is very attractive but it should be noted that Kosova is being manipulated by the United States and NATO in order to maintain a large military presence in the region.

    May ALLAH aid the oppressed Muslims wherever they are and protect them from the machinations of their enemies.

  5. Avatar

    Dawud Israel

    February 19, 2008 at 2:51 AM

    The first thought that came to my mind was that this is a way of rounding up 2 million Muslims so that they can be eventually killed no?

    The other thing is most of the brothers I know from this part of the world put their race and country waaayyyy before their relation to Islam.

    I think they are going to hand over the responsibility of helping the new state to the EU which is divided over the secession so…so it’s not hard to see how problems can get started. And Russia among other states don’t want to support this because it would imply they should also secede some of their lands…

    May Allah watch over these Muslims. Ameen.

  6. Avatar

    Abutoam

    February 19, 2008 at 2:54 AM

    Alhamdulillaahi. Allaahumma Aizzal Islaam wal muslimeen wa adhilla Shirkah wal mushrikeen wa dammir A’adaahaka wa a’adaaha deen (O! Allah, elevate Islam and the muslims and debase polytheism and the polytheists, destroy your enemies and the enemies of Al-Islam) aamin.

  7. Avatar

    Dawud Israel

    February 19, 2008 at 2:56 AM

    By the way it’s spelt “Kosovo” not “Kosova”

    But I think Kosova is the Albanian way of referring to it…

  8. Amad

    Amad

    February 19, 2008 at 3:05 AM

    Yes, indeed, spelling it like Kosova is actually important… travel tip: DONT use Kosovo!

    The spelling “Kosovo” is used in English and Serbia; however, the spelling “Kosova” is used in Albanian.

    So, you can see why Kosovars (that is the adjective) would like to be known by their Albanian pronunciation, not by the pronunciation of Serbs, their sworn enemies.

  9. Avatar

    fastaqim.blogspot.com

    February 19, 2008 at 5:14 AM

    Thank you. May Allah guide our people.

    And yes, Kosova is the correct way to say it, Kosovo is offensive to Kosovars.

  10. Avatar

    Abdullah

    February 19, 2008 at 5:35 AM

    First they give you Independence Day, then the flag, then the national anthem. Then they make you celebrate this every year calling it Independence Day. This is nothing but the continuation of the divide and rule of Muslim world. The real independence can only be with the Caliphate.

  11. Avatar

    Organic Muslimah

    February 19, 2008 at 7:41 AM

    Allahu Akbar!

  12. Avatar

    theManOfFewWords

    February 19, 2008 at 3:11 PM

    Subhanallah, too much excitement. I think Muslims need to have a more nuanced understanding of what is going on.

    Though I will admit that our knowledge of the Balkans, a relatively obscure part of the world, is limited.

    It’s unfortunate because it seems like the ww I model is being repeated. Russia is irked to say the least, that the US is messing around in its backyard, so to speak. The US is trying to set up another client state and establish a permanent base there while Russia is concerned that this is the latest in US interference including moves in Georgia, Lithuania and other former Soviet Socialist republics in the Caucuses and Eastern Europe.

    The network of alliances and interests developing doesnt bode well for the future. Like WW I where all the hostilities were sparked by a relatively minor incident in the Balkans there could very well be a repeat but these Kosovar and Albanian Muslims will be caught in the middle and manipulated. I am afraid that neither the Muslims of Kosovo nor the Serbians or their respective allies are behaving very honorably not can we say that ANY side is th “good” side.

    A far more amicable solution is preferable where Kosova reacquires its autonomous status and remains part of Bosnia. The puppet leader of Kosova is a shady and disreputable character repeating a familiar Middle Eastern model. It is better to have an arrangement that guaruntees the rights of the Muslim minority and fosters cooperation and good feelings between neighboring national communities.

    The alternative is a tiny state surrounded by hostile entities relying on the US and 25k NATO troops for protection. This is only setting up the Muslims for a bad end. The troops may not be there forever and the result will be another ugly episode involving Great Game tactics with big powers manipulating and stoking ethnic conflicts for their own gain.

    May ALLAH have mercy on the Muslims.

  13. Avatar

    Yusuf Smith

    February 19, 2008 at 3:38 PM

    As-Salaamu ‘alaikum,

    Kosovo is the country’s original and historical name; Kosova is the Albanian name. One presumes they are different genders, but in Albanian, a place’s name changes depending on where it appears in a sentence. So, the town of Gjirokaster, in Albania itself, is often called Gjirokastra (gj is like the d in the British pronunciation of due).

    A bit about the status of Islam and Muslims in Kosovo:

    http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1189959421350&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout

  14. Avatar

    Ahmad AlFarsi

    February 19, 2008 at 7:13 PM

    From the above link Yusuf posted it says:

    The girls donned the hijab just before the start of the school year on September 3, becoming the first in Skenderaj to abide by the Islamic dress code.

    Skenderaj’s 70,000 population are all Muslims and the city is home to 14 mosques. The two schools are the only high schools in the city.

    SubhanAllah, what a sad state for the Muslims there to be in. If I am understanding the article properly, these 3 high school sisters are the first sisters in Skenderaj (in this era) to EVER wear hijab?!?!? Something sounds way off about that… that would make the fraction of hijabis in the city roughly 3/35000 sisters… or 0.008 % of the city’s population. I pray to Allah subhanahu wa ta’ala that the reality isn’t THAT dismal and I am just misunderstanding the article.

    Wa Allahu al-Musta’an!!!

  15. Avatar

    fastaqim.blogspot.com

    February 20, 2008 at 1:25 AM

    Yusuf, only serbs use “kosovo”. gjirokaster and gjirokstra is used in different sentences, just like kosova and kosove. for example, im from kosova, and im going to kosove. serbs have different names and pronouncinations of our cities and places, which the west uses. and we do not.

  16. Amad

    Amad

    February 20, 2008 at 1:42 AM

    fastaqim, are you from kosova? If you are, then would love to hear more perspectives about the Muslims over there.

    wslam

  17. Avatar

    meh

    February 23, 2008 at 11:25 PM

    Ahmed al-Farsi, why don’t you ever express horror when your precious Taliban murder young girls who dare to get an education? Why don’t you ever bring awareness to Dukhtaran-e-Millat fanatics who throw acid on the faces of women who defy the burka diktat?

    In addition, I bet none of the hypocrites on this site would welcome the Hazaras had they declared independence from Afghanistan. After all, according to many Muslims, it’s perfectly okay to murder Shi’a Hazaras because they didn’t want to live under Taliban control. The same government that many people on this site blindly support and praise, despite their brutality that is just as comparable to the Serbs against Muslims.


    **First of all, “meh”, this comment is 100% COMPLETELY unrelated to the post. We ask that you please stay on topic, otherwise, your comments will be moderated. We are letting this one pass, since you made a few sweeping generalizations that we would like to address.

    (1) MM, as an organization, has never supported nor denounced the Taliban as whole (while individual opinions criticizing certain practices of the Taliban have been expressed in the past).

    (2) If we are going to talk about all those incidents, lets also talk about the number of rapes/sex harrasment that occur in western countries, the # of girl-abortions that take place in india, the sita rite (burning widows alive) in india, etc… It is completely out of place to bring up some practices of the Taliban out of thin air, in the context of the oppression of Kosovars by Serbia.

    Again, in the future, please make sure your comment is related to the topic at hand, or your post may be moderated. – MM **

  18. Avatar

    Party Pooper (whatever)

    February 24, 2008 at 3:37 AM

    I also share the concern of Dawud Israel.

    Further, there is also the scenario of having “created” Kosova for Muslims and Israel for Europeans caucasian zionists.

    Will Muslims complaining about Israel be pointed to the case of Kosova as an example of the fair “justice” dished out by America?

    A more fantastic solution to the thugs in Serbia would have been to take the persecuted Muslims and give them the land of “Israel”. In return the “Israelis” could have been displaced to the beaches, and other resourceless areas delineated with walls (places like Gaza and the West Bank). Or they could simply just be returned home to Germany and other European countries which have now become far more zionist friendly – despite retaining their hatred of other faiths that they see as non-white.

    The land of “Israel” is also a promised land for the Muslims, so I am surprised that it was not a serious solution put on the table. After all, it was a very serious solution to the protection of Caucasian European Jews from the Christian Nazi thugs – planting those persecuted Europeans in the Middle East – after all, they could have made Lichtenstein into “Israel” at that time.

  19. Avatar

    jdawg

    February 25, 2008 at 10:44 AM

    yes, and may the new Kosovar state send your sister’s and daughters into prostitution supported by the current PM who has Mafia ties…don’t be surprised when the US leaves your satellite state high and dry after they’ve depleted Albania’s natural resources and the conflict with Russia ends.

  20. Avatar

    jdawg

    February 25, 2008 at 10:49 AM

    by the way, how is Kosovo “oppressed by Serbia” right now? The region is 90% Albanian, with less than 10% of the population being Serbian in the north bordering with Serbia. And, you have Nato soldiers protecting you, so guess what would happen if they weren’t there? Serbs would come in and kick your arses, but you have Big Brother to help you declare your phoney independance…enjoy it while it lasts.

  21. Amad

    Amad

    February 25, 2008 at 11:03 AM

    Serbs would come in and kick your arses

    The Serbs are not famous for “kicking arses”, but in committing genocides. Killing innocent men, women and children. I don’t think that that is anything to be proud of, is it jdawg?

    I don’t know what the US and its “co-conspirators” have in plan for Kosova (get your spelling right buddy), but it can’t be any worse than living under a regime whose majority almost tried to eliminate your entire population.

    Why don’t Serbs concentrate on development and growth, rather than engaging in their national pastime of killing ethnic Albanians (Muslims)? If Kosova is 90% Albanian, then let them be ruled by Albanians, not by people who have great enmity against them?

  22. Avatar

    jdawg

    February 25, 2008 at 2:52 PM

    Well there’s animosity towards the ethnic Albanians b/c they came in and took over their heartland, they have a country don’t they? Or is Albania not home to Albanians? They left that country b/c the backwater poverty of Serbia is still prolly better than that craphole. And who committed genocide? I see you’re buying into American propaganda, I was under the impression that there was a civil war going on and both sides were killing one another.

  23. Avatar

    jdawg

    February 25, 2008 at 2:53 PM

    And depending on which ethnicity you are, it’s pronounced “Kosovo”

  24. Amad

    Amad

    February 25, 2008 at 3:24 PM

    jdawg, I think it would be respectful to pronounce a nation’s name by how the locals like it pronounced, esp. if they find the other pronunciation offensive?

    I don’t think that Kosova suddenly became Albanian dominated because Albanians moved there. I imagine that they have been there for generations.

    Civil war may be technically correct, but when there is a government-sponsored ethnic-cleansing, then that civil war becomes kind of lopsided. At that point, it is a war of aggression against a helpless minority.

    If the information on the killing fields of Kosova and before that Bosnia, were simply based on a couple of accounts, I could accept that as more American propaganda. But I think the facts make it clear that this was definitely ethnic-cleansing. Obviously Serbs don’t like Albanians, and I get that even in your few comments. So, keeping Kosova under Serb control would be a recipe for disastor and more killings.

    If Serbs were smart, they’d accept the reality of things, set up good relations with the Kosova government, and move on. There is a lot more gained in moving on than to bemoan about what’s already done.

  25. Avatar

    jdawg

    February 25, 2008 at 4:53 PM

    Ethnic assumptions aside, I think I’ll refer to the “nation” the same way I see it spelled in Western articles, you know the West right? That magical place that recognized Kosovo’s indepednance illegally. And to lay any questions to rest, I am of Canadian decent living in France, with ties to Croatia and Serbia and I know a handful of Albanians, none of whom I find offensive by the way. We all agree that the West’s intervention in the matter is totally unnecessary and illegal, and adding fire to an already volatile situation. And while I couldn’t care less whether or not Kosovo-and-Metohija remain a part of Serbia, I am against the US meddling and the precedent it sets.

    It’s true that Serbs in Serbia don’t like Albanians for the most part, but there haven’t been any incidences since ’99 so how can you assumed that it would be “a recipe for disaster”? If Serbs were smart (and we know they’re not the brightest, re: riots in Belgrad this week), they would set up good relations with the Kosovo government, which is something they’ve been trying to do for some time, but in efforts to keep Kosovo within Serbia. It appears it’s not going to happen, my beef is the legality of the issue, and just remember folks, the US helped put Saddam into power in Iraq back in the day and we all know how that turned out.

  26. Amad

    Amad

    February 25, 2008 at 5:23 PM

    jdawg, thank for your measured response.

    I don’t think we can use the incident-rate since ’99 as a measure for harmony, because Kosova has been under UN protection. Who knows what would have happened if it was free for all?

    I agree though, that considering the precedences that US has been setting in foreign affairs, there is much to be suspicious of. And I also agree that the US uses the UN’s mandate when it wants, and ignores it when it doesn’t. Like for instance, the US’s blind-eye towards outstanding resolutions against Israel (to withdraw from occupied territories).

    But as Muslims, we will take what we can get! After all, we haven’t been getting much of a break on other probably worse state offenders… Chechnya, Kashmir, Palestine, etc.

  27. Avatar

    jdawg

    February 25, 2008 at 6:24 PM

    No problem, this is not hate mongering, it’s a forum to express opinions and I hate when name-calling enters the fray. It’s hard to disconnect completely with some issues emotionally, but let’s try people.

  28. Avatar

    jdawg

    February 25, 2008 at 6:28 PM

    And we use “Kosovo” but the name changes depending on which case is being used in Serbo-Croatian

  29. Avatar

    Manas

    February 26, 2008 at 1:43 AM

    Salaam

    I am not very sure about realities on ground, but is there any chance that they may merge with Albania and Bosnia?

  30. Avatar

    whatever

    February 26, 2008 at 4:16 AM

    This idea is really beginning to gain momentum with me.

    Why not take the Muslim people of Kosova and Albania and airlift them to Israel. The European Israelis could be airlifted to the prime European soil of Albania which would be properly in Europe – this would help them get back their EU membership cravings and give them a feeling of getting back to their European roots.

    It would get rid of all the problems, turmoil, and conflicts caused by European Israelis, and at the same time make the Xenophobic Serbs and Russians happy.

    The Islamophobic, pro-Israel Europeans would be happy as they would get their buddy to be closer to them and get rid of a “Muslim” country in Europe. I am really surprised that Russia is not pushing this idea.

    What’s wrong with the idea. I would like a Centre for Strategic Studies “of some kind” to take up this idea and lobby the would be powers.

  31. Avatar

    jdawg

    February 26, 2008 at 8:14 AM

    I think the main problem with airlifting and “country swapping” would be that you’d be displacing millions of people.

  32. Avatar

    jdawg

    February 26, 2008 at 8:48 AM

    also, someone on this thread mentioned combining Kosovo(a) with Bosnia, which probably wouldn’t be a bad idea, but I dont think the Albanian government would go for it, and neither would B&H seeing as how there is also a large serb population there, unless the serb state within B&H was given to serbia in exchange, which again would most likely never happen. The course of history has been put into motion and I think it’s best to leave the rest to the puppet masters (Bush, Putin and the rest of the gang)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

#Current Affairs

Questions About My Political Activism | Imam Omar Suleiman

Imam Omar Suleiman

Published

on

Imam Omar Suleiman activism

Bismillah Al Rahman Al Raheem,

I thank Allah for the blessing of in person interactions. The simple joy of meeting your brother and sister in the Masjid with a smile and salaam that removes the shaytan from our hearts. The ability to ask questions clearly and immediately bury hatchets (which some forgo for destructive emails and WhatsApp threads even with their neighbors). I’m blessed to live in the incredible Valley Ranch Islamic Center community where I serve as Resident Scholar in a voluntary capacity. Members of my Masjid and the Dallas community can approach me and ask me anything about something I’ve said or something being said about me, and we walk away as brothers and sisters. I had the same blessing in New Orleans where I served as full-time Imam for 6 years. And I am blessed to meet people around the country and around the world that I love for Allah. Those are lifelong bonds that I pray continue in the hereafter under Allah’s shade. 

I also thank Allah for the online world that allows people to connect in good when otherwise they would not have been able to benefit. Without social media and expanding ways of technology, good content and avenues for charity would be far more limited. I’m grateful for all of you that have connected with me and prayed for me over the years. I don’t want to take away from any of that. With that being said, the online world does of course have its pitfalls. There can be a lack of mercy and husn al dhann (good assumptions) with one another, and widespread gossip and slander. It’s also uniquely destructive to those who garner large followings even due to good reasons. It’s very easy to praise someone you only know through videos and pictures, as it is to tear them down. Allah has tested some of us with fame through this machine, and it is a mighty test. I pray that Allah allows all of the people that I’ve been blessed to benefit in this world to be witnesses for me on the day of judgment, and that He not shame me or raise me amongst the hypocrites who didn’t practice what they preached. 

As the great sage Imam Ibn Al Jawzee (ra) said, “Know that if people are impressed with you, in reality they are impressed with the beauty of Allah’s covering of your sins.” It is very easy to deceive and be deceived through a screen. I pray that Allah allow any unjust critiques that I receive to be an expiation for all the undue praise I receive. People are usually imbalanced in their love and hate. The test is whether that love stops you from correcting your brother when he is wrong, or that hate that causes you to swerve from justice.

With that introduction, I’d like to address questions about my political positions and affiliations. Why? Because I do believe in accountability and transparency. Deceptive voices should be ignored, concerned ones shouldn’t. Certainly, there are falsehoods and hit pieces that often are disguised as legitimate critiques. But there are also legitimate critiques and/or requests for clarification. Over the past several years, I have had both types forwarded to me. I am not concerned with those who use deception to falsely portray me or my work. I am concerned about those who genuinely have questions, and don’t have them answered. I have sought to clarify my own political positions through my work on numerous occasions such as here, here, and here. I will quote some of that content here. But I hope this will be a thorough article that can be referenced any time in the future when questions about who I am and what I represent are brought up. Moreover, I hope it can be a conversation starter about what types of political frameworks are actually beneficial to the community.

The Foundation and Legitimate Differences

I believe that the Quran and Sunnah should be the foundation for everything that we do, public and private. That means never exceeding their boundaries, and also manifesting their calls. Many people forget the latter, and only focus on the former. If the only time the Quran and Sunnah are invoked in discussions of activism and justice is to shut down something deemed illegitimate or impermissible, we suggest that our divine sources have stagnated and are unable to converse with the world around us today. I believe in amplifying the beautiful solutions from our religion to confront the ugly realities of the climate around us. The Deen is rich and beautiful. The Seerah is an incredible guide to everything in life. Through Yaqeen Institute, I had the blessing of doing the 40 on justice series that spanned for over a year and a half where I hoped to articulate a Sunnah-lens to the issues around us. My goal is to now develop that into a book. I believe the person and message of the Prophet (saw) speaks to us as clearly now as it did in the year 620, and that everything we do should be in accordance with it.

There can be reasonable debate about the Sunnah and how it’s lived in certain aspects around us. Some use Hudaybiya to justify every form of engagement and say things like, “if the Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) were alive, he would do this.” I don’t want to project anything on the Prophet (saw). My attempt is to draw from his Sunnah, not legitimize my shahawat. There are areas where the Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) showed compromise, but he never lost clarity. While the treaty of Hudaybiya had to omit “Al Rahman Al Raheem” from the name of Allah, and “RasulAllah” from the name of Muhammad ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him), none of the companions were confused about their realities.

The legitimate debates around how to truly implement the Sunnah today largely emanate from what aspects of the Prophetic call are it’s defining features, and what our priorities and timelines, political or otherwise, should be. Tawheed is the foundation and primary basis for it all. As for what aspects of the call are defining features, the Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) was sent us a mercy to the worlds, defined his mission as perfection of character, said that Allah loves gentleness in all of His affairs, and was revolutionary in his compassion to everything around him. That doesn’t mean he didn’t at times get angry or use power to eliminate evil. He was not limited by his mercy, but always enhanced by it.

As for priorities and timelines, even the companions frequently differed. There are examples from the life of the Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him), and after. During Hudaybiya, Ali (ra) did not want to erase from the treaty what the Quraysh wanted him to. Omar raḍyAllāhu 'anhu (may Allāh be pleased with him) wanted to proceed forth to Makkah that very moment. The companions found themselves unwilling to accept that they would have to turn back. Abu Bakr raḍyAllāhu 'anhu (may Allāh be pleased with him) saw things the way the Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) saw them. Umm Salama raḍyAllāhu 'anha (may Allāh be pleased with her) advised the Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) in those difficult times how to get everyone on the same page despite those strong feelings.

The debates about this were deep in many aspects of Fiqh (jurisprudence) after the death of the Prophet (saw), none so more than regarding political issues. We know the Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) taught us to seek both justice and stability. But at what point and at what cost is it permissible to challenge the power structure? No one was ambiguous about tyranny, but they differed greatly as to how to challenge it. In the first massive fitna to engulf the community, the painful debate over the assassination of Uthman  put Ali raḍyAllāhu 'anhu (may Allāh be pleased with him) on the defensive about whether or not he was interested in pursuing his killers in the first place. He was of course, but believed in stabilizing the Khilafa before pursuing the assassins to not cause more bloodshed. When Omar Ibn AbdulAzeez (ra) who pushed legendary reforms in his 2 year Khilafa was questioned by his son about some of the things he wasn’t pursuing, he responded, “Oh my son, do you want me to try to compel them upon the religion all at once, so that they abandon it all at once?”

My work politically revolves around eliminating suffering, domestically and abroad. This shapes how I view militarism, poverty, policing, mass incarceration, environmental issues, healthcare, immigration, and torture. The Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) said, “find me amongst the oppressed. Are you given aid and support by Allah except by how you treat your most vulnerable?” I believe that we as Muslims, especially those who claim orthodoxy, should assert ourselves in these areas. This doesn’t mean that I think this is the only area in which Muslims should be active. Different people should work in different areas of good, and not undermine one another. Good efforts should be complementary to each other. My background suits this particular role. I grew up with deeply humanitarian parents, worked as a field coordinator in disaster relief, and feel strongly moved towards these causes. While most came to know me through Islamic lectures, I have never not been involved in these things. Fighting exploitation and oppression are part and parcel of our religious identity. Not only should Muslims be present in these areas, they should be leading the way. And that’s not because it’s good political strategy or public relations, but because it’s scriptural imperative.

I’m also concerned with Religious Freedom and think we should assert our right as a Muslim community, as should other communities, to live out our faith unhindered, and our institutions un-harassed. Conservatives tend to leave Muslims out in their calls and lace them with other forms of bigotry we can’t stomach, and liberals often alienate religious communities like Orthodox Jews, Black Churches, Muslims, etc. while claiming to be for pluralism and inclusivity.

I cannot in good conscience support anything that is opposed to the Sunnah, even as a matter of political expediency. I believe in working together with communities on things we agree upon, and learning to respectfully coexist with things we don’t agree upon. On such affairs, I maintain political neutrality with religious clarity and relationship building that allows us to have these hard discussions as human beings seeking to reduce societal tension and promote the common good. I use multi-faith work as a blueprint for this. If people can harmoniously coexist despite strong beliefs about God, purpose, salvation, and scripture, surely they can learn to coexist on political issues that are of far lesser consequence to them in their worldviews. 

All of this warrants discussion on priorities, pragmatism, gradualism, and political programs. As Muslims, we should have vibrant disagreements that start off with: 1. What Allah and the Messenger ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) deem as good is good, and what they deem as bad is bad. 2. People can disagree on how to apply those realities to the world around us without obscuring the lawful and the prohibited. 3. People should maintain good assumptions about one another and not accuse their intentions when they disagree. 

At the end of the day, these are largely areas of Ijtihad and we’re all on the same team.

Pictures and Associations

I rarely request anyone to take pictures with me, but I never turn them down. I have my reasons for that. It is primarily a personal decision I formed after going to the funeral of Muhammad Ali (may Allah have mercy on him) in Louisville. I was deeply moved by how everyone from the shuttle driver, to the hotel clerk, to the gas station employees, etc. had a story about meeting him. He never turned down a request, and that meant something to people. My colleagues and I differ on this issue. On one hand, we don’t want to feed celebrity culture. On the other hand, we don’t want to disappoint, hurt, or leave people feeling slighted. This is where I’m at on this, and I don’t think I have it in me to say no to someone who asks for a picture. 

My “associations” are widespread because I engage numerous spaces. I get invited to conferences and campuses, mosques and festivals. Anywhere I go, I try to be courteous to people and that should not mean an endorsement of all that they do or stand for. I do not believe appearing in a picture with someone or in a common space is me promoting them, or even them promoting me. 

Guilt by association is the most deceitful way of targeting someone. It’s what the Khawarij do. It’s also what Islamophobes have been doing to take down every Muslim leader in the community since 9/11. They draw the association as wide as possible, then associate you with every position through that association making it impossible to defend yourself.

My positions are only the ones I actually espouse.

Platforms and Panels

As for platforms and panels, I typically will not turn them down unless I feel like the platform itself is so biased that I won’t be able to speak my mind, or there is no value in my opinion even if I’m allowed to speak it. Most recently I sat on a panel at the Texas Tribune Festival on religious freedom with Sr. Asma Uddin from the Freedom Forum Institute, and staunch republicans like Rep. Matt Krause and Kevin Roberts, the Executive Director of the Texas Public Policy Foundation. I’m in dialogue at an event early next year with the most prominent evangelical preacher in the country. I often share the stage with staunch liberals who agree with me on issues of militarism, torture, policing, and immigration, but are quite hostile to religion. I try to do right by my part on panels regardless of who else is serving on it. The only time I would participate in a public boycott of a panel or platform is if it’s a collective push to purge someone who has just taken a position or done something that would inherently tarnish the panel or platform. I did this, for example, in the wake of the Rabaa’ massacre with scholars who legitimized it. When I’m invited to a highly partisan place like the Texas Democratic Convention, I try to be very specific with my subject matter (where I spoke about children victimized by policy here and abroad, and brought up Gitmo and Abu Ghraib).

How Do I Choose Whether or Not to Accept an Invitation

Istikhara (prayer) and Istishara (consultation). I have turned down many high profile events because I thought my presence would be tokenizing and unsubstantial. With my invocation in Congress, I literally forwarded the invite to my teacher and asked him whether or not I should do it. He advised me to go forward and give an invocation that would leave people thinking. I hope that was achieved even though I must admit I wasn’t expecting the flurry of attacks afterwards. Imam Siraj traces the beginning of the avalanche of hate against him to his invocation in congress, but I had hoped that all the relationships I had built would ward off some of that.

Most of my invites are not so confusing, but some of them are. Have I regretted accepting certain invites? Yes. But I don’t lament too much over them so long as I did proper Istikhara and Istishara.

Demonstrations, Coalitions, and Alliances

In our tribal politics in America, platforms are wide and coalitions are narrow. I believe in the exact opposite. I believe we should have specific issues that we determine important and meaningful, and form broad coalitions around those specific issues. This way the work is focused, the ally-ship is clear, and the advocacy is unproblematic. When it’s a bunch of people working on a small set of issues, the issues dominate the conversation as opposed to who is at the table. It’s about what we’re at the table for. 

So if we’re going to organize a march on the border, against ICE deportations, or against police brutality, I don’t care who else is coming to march or where they stand on other issues. This to me was the essence of Hilf Al Fudul. The tribes came together for one purpose of supporting those who were exploited because they didn’t have the protection of belonging to powerful classes, and the Prophet (saw) said he would take that pledge in jahiliya or Islam.

Partisan Politics

I don’t believe in uncritically adopting a platform, or letting a party take advantage of our vulnerability. We need to challenge Democrats just as strongly as we do Republicans, while remaining independent and principled. We have a right to an agenda like any other community. Politicians should have to work for our vote, and we shouldn’t shy away from where we differ with candidates even when we vote for them.

You can read my article on voting here in which I lay out those principles.

As a side note on endorsements, I’ve only endorsed 2 candidates in my life, one a Muslim candidate for city council and another a candidate for county chair. With the Beto campaign against Ted Cruz last year, who I believe is the most dangerous man in the Senate for various reasons, I particularly reached out to the campaign to clarify some concerns about the criminalizing of BDS. I applauded him for taking the time to meet me and clarify those concerns. With the recent news on his  comments on revoking the tax-exempt status of religious institutions, I once again reached out to those who I know from the campaign to register the community’s disapproval and was able to have a fruitful conversation about it. And no, I’m not endorsing him or any candidate for president right now.

Left vs Right

I wrote an article in the Dallas Morning News about transcending the left/right divide. In it, I said, “Most of the religious presence in our political discourse seems to be superficial with the religious left and the religious right often simply representing nothing more than the political left and the political right with collars.”

I believe Muslims should be engaging well-meaning people on different issues from different backgrounds. While the political right may have taken on an overtly Islamophobic posture, there are conservative religious groups that may be willing to work with us and dialogue on issues of mutual concern. I welcome that 

We need to be a part of constructing the moral center in America instead of waiting for it to happen without our input whether its on domestic or foreign policy. We don’t have to adopt anyone else’s blind spots. We can talk about the child from Guatemala and the child from Gaza. We can talk about the sanctity of the child in the womb, and the sanctity of the child in the cage. We can talk about Gitmo and Abu Ghraib abroad, and our own mass incarceration systems at home. If some Republicans are the only ones willing to speak about the Muslim Uighurs in the name of religious freedom, we can work with them on that.

Not everyone has to work in all of these spaces simultaneously, but we should appreciate those who do so long as they don’t forsake their principles in the process.

On Engaging Government

This is a hard one so I’ll break it down into a few things:

  1. Local, State, Federal

I strongly believe in the idea of most politics being local, and that Muslims need to have a strong presence in city and state government. My invitation to Congress was due to my local work with Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson who has been an incredible ally to our community. I think it gets trickier at the federal level. I’ve personally never been inside the White House under any administration for an Iftar or otherwise, but I don’t fault all who have. I know some who have tried very hard to do right in those tricky spaces. I was invited to the last Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom at the State Department and declined. I think this is the trickiest space of them all, and wish those who engage it well. My hope is that anyone who does engage it raise our issues and make it clear to the community that they are doing so. I have never participated in CVE work, nor has Yaqeen ever taken CVE money, and I am opposed to it as a framework due to how it’s used exclusively against the Muslim community.

I differentiate between patriotism and nationalism and believe that our government should be held accountable for its violation of human rights like any other government. And war crimes have spanned administrations of both parties for a very long time.

  1. Foreign Governments

I am particularly skeptical of many Muslim governments considering the role that installed dictators and despots have played in suppressing the Muslim community worldwide. They have been the greatest violators of our rights, and the most shameful purveyors of Islamophobia as evidenced by the support given to China’s genocide of the Uyghurs. I don’t think it’s impossible to work with foreign leaders on specific issues, but that it requires crystal clear clarity from those who do on the issues those governments are criminally implicated. Granting religious legitimacy to tyrants who have themselves harmed or enabled harm towards the global community is incredibly dangerous. And it is important to not become co-opted by the lesser aggressors from the Muslim world. While some foreign leaders do better than others on certain issues, they will consistently disappoint on others. None of them should be able to buy the silence of the American Muslim community.

On Muslim Politicians

No politician, Muslim or otherwise, deserves our uncritical support for their political positions. Every Muslim, politician or otherwise, deserves our dua for their guidance and wellbeing. 

This is a tricky reality to navigate. When they take bold political positions, they should be qualifiedly praised specifically for those actions. When they do things that are problematic, they should be measuredly criticized specifically for those actions. We should want them to do well, and want well for them. As politicians, they naturally make decisions that they have to be accountable to the public for. As brothers and sisters, we should pray for them to make the right decisions and be enabled with and for the truth. As a community, we can’t put it on them to save the Deen. There will be more politicians that will come up in coming years, and our Dawah needs to continue independent of them while reminding them with good manners, supporting them with Dua and Naseeha, and politically engaging them like any other politician.

 

“Donate your reputation to Allah.” by Imam @OmarSuleiman504 Click To Tweet

Callouts

I will not engage in mudslinging or callouts personally, even when they’re against me. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen something that I could easily respond to with one line. But Allah is sufficient for me, and He is the best disposer of all matters. I would hope people can see through unfair attacks. And even when they can’t, I trust that Allah will make the best of the situation and I’d rather not take the community on a ride. Through one of these particular episodes, my teacher and friend told me, “Donate your reputation to Allah.” That stuck with me. If I’m doing what I’m doing for His sake, I shouldn’t be too bothered when other than Him deals with me uncharitably. If I am, I need to work harder on my own intentions.

As for others, I will not use social media to put people on blast. I discuss concepts, not people. Now two fair questions arise from this:

  1.  Can one assume that because I’ve supported people by name in certain contexts, but not criticized them by name, that I support all of their positions? I understand why people could derive that conclusion, and it’s not something I’ve particularly figured out. I don’t think ambiguous cheap shots are the solution either. I personally don’t burn bridges with people in fear of wronging them, and in hopes that I can still advise them. I feel like that’s the best I can do. I hope that people can appreciate that approach not as the only approach, but as an approach.

The Prophet ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) used to employ the language of “what is it with a people that do such and such” (ما بال أقوام يفعلون كذا وكذا ) without actually naming the person in several narrations. This could be seen by some as passive-aggressive, but it’s about clarifying the concept and not focusing on the individual. I typically will try to employ this approach, and will sometimes fall short of it.

  1. Should there not be those who explicitly address wrongdoings, fairly hold leaders accountable, and ask important questions? There absolutely should be, but with good character and fair critique. We can’t adopt the tactics of Islamophobes against our own community. Half-truths, guilt by association, casting aspersions on character, etc. are grievous sins. They also take away from the legitimate critiques. Unfortunately, social media seems so drenched in toxicity that it seems impossible to discuss things with balance. With that being said, we need more forums to have important conversations and I can’t blame people in the meantime for feeling left out of those conversations and confused. As a rule of thumb, try to keep things depersonalized and to the issues. And when you have to say something critical of your brother or sister, try to say something about their good as well. 

What is considered public vs. private

There seems to be this prevailing idea that if it isn’t posted or tweeted, it’s not public. I try to be open in discussion with brothers and sisters when they meet face to face and am much more willing to discuss sensitive issues then. I don’t know of any basis in the Sunnah that would suggest social media is the only way to have a public position. I don’t mind being quoted in what I say in my halaqas or public settings, but simply don’t prefer to engage in certain discussions on social media.

Yaqeen’s direction and funding 

I am not Yaqeen. My political activism is not Yaqeen. I serve as the President of the organization with one vote on the board. I am blessed to work with an incredible team of over 60 people and growing that believe in the mission of the organization to foster a strong viable Islamic identity that preserves the religion in the hearts of our future generations, takes back the narrative from Islamophobes of all sorts, and demonstrates a path forward that doesn’t depart from our divine sources. Some of the writers are my teachers. Others come from entirely different backgrounds. I contribute a tiny fraction of papers myself, but am fulltime in my role as the President of the organization. Yaqeen set out to be as encompassing as possible of Muslim scholars and academics that believe in commitment to the religion, and contributing to the world through it. I believe strongly in institutions that are bigger than personalities, and that is the culture we try to foster from within.

As for our methodology, we have a course and a paper out soon from our scholars which should clarify further what we view as valid means of interpretation, and valid opinions. We try to do extensive peer review and allow opinions to be published within the fold of Islamic acceptability. 

We have extended our hands to Muslim organizations around the country and world to partner in good, and never charge a dime for our content. And for the sake of maintaining independence and integrity, Yaqeen has never taken money from any government entity or foundation that espouses ideas that would delegitimize it. Al hamdulila, all of it is through generous private donors that have found benefit from our content and I’m grateful to each of them for it.

Mistakes

Let me start with the personal. Anyone that serves as an Imam, activist, or representative of the community will be put in awkward situations frequently. Part of growth is learning from those mistakes and being wiser in future situations. I will still inevitably be put in compromising situations and pray that Allah guides me to deal with them with wisdom and rightful guidance. I will continue to listen to people who lovingly point those mistakes out to me in hopes that I do better in the future. May Allah reward them all. And I will take the best of unforgiving critiques and try to still benefit from them. May Allah reward them also if they’re done in sincerity, and forgive them if done for other reasons.

As for the communal, we haven’t figured out a way to host reasonable disagreements that involve various segments of the community. Yaqeen is meant to be a platform to foster some of that within our scopes of research, and some sites like Muslim Matters have also sought to be that when issues of concern arise. Over the past few years, I’ve had the blessing of being a part of an annual retreat that brings together various Islamic scholars of different backgrounds to foster unity amongst ourselves and create space for critical conversation. Sadly there are too many other divisions that exist in the community though to be remedied through that particular space. I think the community has felt locked out of certain discussions, and I can’t blame them for feeling that way. 

Solutions

Clarity. People like myself who are involved in multiple worlds need to not leave the community out of our thinking and articulate our frameworks better. I own that, as I have made many assumptions about what the community did or didn’t think about my positions.

Spaces. I’ve been blessed to be a part of forming some wonderful onsite spaces and forums where we have had some of these difficult conversations. I want to be a part of forming some of these spaces online with the realistic expectation that they will never equal the blessing of sitting with one another. I hope our community invests in more retreats where scholars of different backgrounds, activists, etc. can come together and discuss tough things, and then produce their findings. 

The Rope of Allah

Allah tells us to hold firm to the rope of Allah. The rope isn’t a political idea or opinion, it’s divine revelation. We are bonded by it and should honor that bond. We can disagree with each other and still love each other. We can debate ideas intelligently without descending into tactics unbefitting of the ummah of the Prophet (saw). We should be just with one another and not use the ways of our enemies against each other. I’m sure not everyone agrees with my framework above, and I may also change some of my opinions as time goes on. I pray that none of it ever swerves from what is established through the divine sources, or into anything divisive, hateful, or unjust.

The Quran speaks of justice, unity, and accountability. Those themes are not contradictory in Allah’s book, nor do they have to be in our lives. The Sunnah manifests that in a way that we can all learn how to conduct ourselves. This doesn’t mean we excuse everything in the name of Adab, it means we use Adab even when holding people accountable.

I end with this: Yunus al-Sadafi reported: I have not seen anyone wiser than Al-Shafi’i, may Allah be pleased with him. I debated him one day over an issue, and then we separated. He later met me and took my hand, then he said, “O Abu Musa, can we not continue to be brothers, even if we disagree on an issue?”

May Allah keep us united upon good, faithful to Him always, carriers of His Prophet’s way, and beneficial to the entirety of humanity. May He forgive us for our shortcomings, guide us to the straight path, and remove from us all that displeases Him in our worship and work.

اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ أَنْ أَضِلَّ أَوْ أُضَلَّ أَوْ أَزِلَّ أَوْ أُزَلَّ أَوْ أَظْلِمَ أَوْ أُظْلَمَ أَوْ أَجْهَلَ أَوْ يُجْهَلَ عَلَىَّ

O Allah, I seek refuge with You from going astray or stumbling, from wronging others or being wronged, and from behaving or being treated in an ignorant manner.

Read: Our Brothers Who have Transgressed Against Us | Imam Omar Suleiman

Continue Reading

#Current Affairs

Zahra Billoo Responds To The Women’s March Inc. Voting Her Off The New Board

Zahra Billoo

Published

on

Women's March Board

Earlier tonight, I was voted off the Women’s March, Inc. national board. This followed an Islamophobic smear campaign led by the usual antagonists, who have long targeted me, my colleagues, and anyone else who dares speak out in support of Palestinian human rights and the right to self-determination.

The past 48 hours have been a spiral of bad news and smear efforts. Part of the smear campaign is motivated by opponents of the Women’s March, because the organization has traditionally challenged the status quo of power and white supremacy in our country. However, much of the campaign is driven by people who oppose me and my work challenging the occupation of Palestine, our country’s perpetuation of unjust and endless wars, and law enforcement operations targeting the American Muslim community.

The Women’s March, Inc. is an organization I once held dear. I spoke at the first march, spoke at regional marches every year after, spoke at the convention, participated in national actions including the original Kavanaugh protests, and worked to mobilize Muslim women for their efforts.

During the past few years right-wingers, from the President’s son to the Anti-Defamation League and troll armies, have targeted the Women’s March, Inc. For so long, I’ve admired their resilience in speaking truth to power, in working together, and in never cowering. Over and over again, the co-founders of Women’s March, Inc. put their lives on the line, winning power for all women in all of our diversity. The Women’s March, Inc. that voted me off its board tonight is one that no longer demonstrates the strength that inspired millions of women across the country.

To see and experience its new leaders caving to right-wing pressure, and casting aside a woman of color, a Muslim woman, a long-time advocate within the organization, without the willingness to make any efforts to learn and grow, breaks my heart. This isn’t about a lost seat, there will be many seats. The Women’s March, Inc. has drawn a line in the sand, one that will exclude many with my lived experiences and critiques. It has effectively said, we will work on some women’s rights at the expense of others.

To be clear, anti-semitism is indeed a growing and dangerous problem in our country, as is anti-Blackness, anti-immigrant sentiment, Islamophobia, ableism, sexism, and so much more. I condemn any form of bigotry unequivocally, but I also refuse to be silent as allegations of bigotry are weaponized against the most marginalized people, those who find sanctuary and hope in the articulation of truth.

In looking at the tweets in question, I acknowledge that I wrote passionately. While I may have phrased some of my content differently today, I stand by my words. I told the truth as my community and I have lived it, through the FBI’s targeting of my community, as I supported families who have lost loved ones because of US military actions, and as I learned from the horrific experiences of Palestinian life.

In attempting to heal and build in an expedited manner within Women’s March, Inc., I offered to meet with stakeholders to address their concerns and to work with my sisters on the new board to learn, heal, and build together. These efforts were rejected. And in rejecting these efforts, the new Women’s March, Inc. demonstrated that they lack the courage to exhibit allyship in the face of fire.

I came to Women’s March, Inc. to work. My body of work has included leading a chapter of the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights organization for over a decade, growing it now more than six-fold. In my tenure, I have led the team that forced Abercrombie to change its discriminatory employment policies, have been arrested advocating for DACA, partnered with Jewish organizations including Bend the Arc and Jewish Voice for Peace to fight to protect our communities, and was one of the first lawyers to sue the President.

It is not my first time being the target of a smear campaign. The Women’s March, Inc., more than any place, is where I would have expected us to be able to have courageous conversations and dive deep into relationship-building work.

I am happy to have as many conversations as it takes to listen and learn and heal, but I will no longer be able to do that through Women’s March, Inc. This action today demonstrates that this organization’s new leadership is unable to be an ally during challenging times.

My beliefs drive my work, and I am not seeking accolades or positions of power. These past few days have been the greatest test of that. My integrity, my truth, and my strength comes from God and a place of deep conviction. I will continue my work as a civil rights lawyer and a faith-based activist, speaking out against the occupation of Palestine and settler-colonialism everywhere, challenging Islamophobia and all forms of racism and bigotry in the United States, and building with my community and our allies in our quest to be our most authentic and liberated selves.

Onward, God willing.

Continue Reading

#Society

Obituary of (Mawlana) Yusuf Sulayman Motala (1366/1946 – 1441/2019)

Monday, September 9, turned out to be a day of profound anguish and sorrow for many around the world. In the early morning hours, news of the death of Mawlana* Yusuf Sulayman Motala, fondly known as “Hazrat” (his eminence) to those who were acquainted with him, spread. He had passed away on Sunday at 8:20 pm EST in Toronto, after suffering a heart attack two weeks earlier.

Dr. Mufti Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera

Published

on

Dar Al Uloom Bury, Yusuf Sulayman Motala

A master of hadith and Qur’an. A sufi, spiritual guide and teacher to thousands. A pioneer in the establishment of a religious education system. His death reverberated through hearts and across oceans. We are all mourning the loss of a luminary who guided us through increasingly difficult times.

Monday, September 9, turned out to be a day of profound anguish and sorrow for many around the world. In the early morning hours, news of the death of Mawlana* Yusuf Sulayman Motala, fondly known as “Hazrat” (his eminence) to those who were acquainted with him, spread. He had passed away on Sunday at 8:20 pm EST in Toronto, after suffering a heart attack two weeks earlier. (May the Almighty envelope him in His mercy)

His journey in this world had begun more than 70 years ago in the small village of Nani Naroli in Gujarat, India, where he was born on November 25, 1946 (1 Muharram 1366) into a family known for their piety.

His early studies were largely completed at Jami’a Husayniyya, one of the early seminaries of Gujarat, after which he travelled to Mazahir Ulum, the second oldest seminary of the Indian Sub-Continent, in Saharanpur, India, to complete his ‘alimiyya studies. What drew him to this seminary was the presence of one of the most influential and well-known contemporary spiritual guides, Mawlana Muhammad Zakariyya Kandhlawi (d. 1402/1982), better known as “Hazrat Shaykh.” He had seen Mawlana Zakariyya only briefly at a train stop, but it was enough for him to understand the magnitude of his presence.

Mawlana Yusuf remained in Saharanpur for two years. Despite being younger than many of the other students of Shaykh Zakariya, the shaykh took a great liking to him. Shaykh Zakariya showered him with great attention and even deferred his retirement from teaching Sahih al-Bukhari so that Mawlana Yusuf could study it under his instruction. While in Saharanpur, Mawlana Yusuf also studied under a number of other great scholars, such as Mawlana Muhammad ‘Aqil (author of Al-Durr al-Mandud, an Urdu commentary of Sunan Abi Dawud and current head lecturer of Hadith at the same seminary), Shaykh Yunus Jownpuri (d. 1438/2017) the previous head lecturer of Hadith there), Mawlana As‘adullah Rampuri (d. 1399/1979) and Mufti Muzaffar Husayn (d. 1424/2003).

Upon completion of his studies, Mawlana Yusuf’s marriage was arranged to marry a young woman from the Limbada family that had migrated to the United Kingdom from Gujarat. In 1968, he relocated to the UK and accepted the position of imam at Masjid Zakariya, in Bolton. Although he longed to be in the company of his shaykh, he had explicit instructions to remain in the UK and focus his efforts on establishing a seminary for memorization of Qur’an and teaching of the ‘alimiyya program. The vision being set in motion was to train a generation of Muslims scholars that would educate and guide the growing Muslim community.

Establishing the first Muslim seminary, in the absence of any precedent, was a daunting task. The lack of support from the Muslim community, the lack of integration into the wider British community, and the lack of funds made it seem an impossible endeavour. And yet, Mawlana Yusuf never wavered in his commitment and diligently worked to make the dream of his teacher a reality. In 1973 he purchased the derelict Aitken Sanatorium in the village of Holcombe, near Bury, Lancashire. What had once been a hospice for people suffering from tuberculosis, would become one of the first fully-fledged higher-education Islamic institutes outside of the Indian-Subcontinent teaching the adapted-Nizami syllabus.

The years of struggle by Maulana Yusuf to fulfil this vision paid off handsomely. Today, after four decades, Darul Uloom Al Arabiyya Al Islamiyya, along with its several sister institutes, also founded by Mawlana Yusuf, such as the Jamiatul Imam Muhammad Zakariya seminary in Bradford for girls, have produced well over 2,000 British born (and other international students) male and female ‘alimiyya graduates – many of whom are working as scholars and serving communities across the UK, France, Belgium, Holland, Portugal, the US, Canada, Barbados, Trinidad, Panama, Saudi Arabia, India and New Zealand. Besides these graduates, a countless number of individuals have memorized the Qur’an at these institutes. Moreover, many of the graduates of the Darul Uloom and its sister institutes have set up their own institutes, such as Jamiatul Ilm Wal Huda in Blackburn, Islamic Dawah Academy in Leicester, Jami’ah al-Kawthar in Lancaster, UK, and Darul Uloom Palmela in Portugal, to just mention a few of the larger ones. Within his lifetime, Mawlana Yusuf saw first-hand the fruit of his labours – witnessing his grand students (graduates from his students’ institutes) providing religious instruction and services to communities around the world in their local languages. What started as a relationship of love between a student and teacher, manifested into the transmission of knowledge across continents. In some countries, such as the UK and Portugal, one would be hard-pressed to find a Muslim who had not directly or indirectly benefited from him.

Mawlana Yusuf was a man with deep insights into the needs of Western contemporary society, one that was very different from the one he had grown up and trained in. With a view to contributing to mainstream society, Mawlana Yusuf encouraged his graduates to enter into further education both in post-graduate Islamic courses and western academia, and to diversify their fields of learning through courses at mainstream UK universities. As a result, many ‘alimiyya graduates of his institutes are trained in law, mainstream medicine, natural medicine and homeopathy, mental health, child protection, finance, IT, education, chaplaincy, psychology, philosophy, pharmacy, physics, journalism, engineering, architecture, calligraphy, typography, graphic design, optometry, social services, public health, even British Sign Language. His students also include several who have completed PhDs and lecture at universities. His vision was to train British-born (or other) Muslim scholars who would be well versed in contemporary thought and discipline along with their advanced Islamic learning, equipping them to better contribute to society.

Despite his commitment to the establishment of a public good, the shaykh was an immensely private person and avoided seeking accolade or attention. For many decades he refused invitations to attend conferences or talks around the country, choosing to focus on his students and his family, teaching the academic syllabus and infusing the hearts of many aspirants with the love of Allah through regular gatherings of remembrance (dhikr) and spiritual retreats (i’tikaf) in the way of his shaykh’s Chishti Sufi order.

During my entire stay with him at Darul Uloom (1985–1997), I can say with honesty that I did not come across a single student who spoke ill of him. He commanded such awe and respect that people would find it difficult to speak with him casually. And yet, for those who had the opportunity to converse with him, knew that he was the most compassionate, humble, and loving individual.

He was full of affection for his students and colleagues and had immense concern for the Muslim Ummah, especially in the West. He possessed unparalleled forbearance and self-composure. When he taught or gave a talk, he spoke in a subdued and measured tone, as though he was weighing every word, knowing the import it carried. He would sit, barely moving and without shifting his posture. Even after a surgical procedure for piles, he sat gracefully teaching us Sahih al-Bukhari. Despite the obvious pain, he never made an unpleasant expression or winced from the pain.

Anyone who has listened to his talks or read his books can bear testimony to two things: his immense love for the Messenger of Allah ṣallallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam (peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him) and his love for Shaykh Mawlana Muhammad Zakariya Kandhlawi (may Allah have mercy on him). It is probably hard to find a talk in which he did not speak of the two. His shaykh was no doubt his link to the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him and give him peace) in both his hadith and spiritual transmissions.

Over the last decade, he had retired from most of his teaching commitments (except Sahih al-Bukhari) and had reduced meeting with people other than his weekly dhikr gatherings. His time was spent with his family and young children and writing books. His written legacy comprises over 20 titles, mostly in Urdu but also a partial tafsir of the Qur’an in classical Arabic.

After the news of his heart attack on Sunday, August 25, and the subsequent effects to his brain, his well-wishers around the world completed hundreds of recitals of the Qur’an, several readings of the entire Sahih al-Bukhari, thousands of litanies and wirds of the formula of faith (kalima tayyiba), and gave charity in his name. However, Allah Most High willed otherwise and intended for him to depart this lowly abode to begin his journey to the next. He passed away two weeks later and reports state that approximately 4,000 people attended his funeral. Had his funeral been in the UK, the number of attendees would have multiplied several folds. But he had always shied away from large crowds and gatherings and maybe this was Allah Most High’s gift to him after his death. He was 75 (in Hijra years, and 72 in Gregorian) at the time of his death and leaves behind eight children and several grandchildren.

Mawlana Yusuf educated, inspired and nourished the minds and hearts of countless across the UK and beyond. May Allah Almighty bless him with the loftiest of abodes in the Gardens of Firdaws in the company of Allah’s beloved Messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace) and grant all his family, students, and cherishers around the world beautiful patience.

Dr Mufti Abdur-Rahman Mangera
Whitethread Institute, London
(A fortunate graduate of Darul Uloom Bury, 1996–97)

*a learned Muslim scholar especially in India often used as a form of address
Continue Reading

Trending