Washington Times’s Arrogance

After NY Times’s ‘moderate’ article on CAIR, which I had analyzed here, Washington Times came with its guns blazing on a few days ago. What extremely irks me about this editorial is the sheer arrogance of the Times. This line especially gets under my skin: “This is a lesson [about a robust media] our Muslim brothers will learn sooner or later as they become accustomed to life in America.”

What? Are you kidding me? Is this the semi-respectable ‘unbiased’ newspaper Washington Times, or am I reading commentary on Spencer’s Jihad Watch? Ok, I am not that naive; I know the Times is a conservative right-wing (not just leaning but completely FOXish right-wing) paper. But still, isn’t there something calling journalistic responsibility? Isn’t even the most biased media outlet that purports to report news still supposed to pretend that it is TRYING to be unbiased, even if it ultimately isn’t?

Well, not in Washington Times’s case. This newspaper is so beholden to AIPAC and other right-wing nuts’ position that it does not even pretend to be unbiased. Back to the line that irked then, what in the world are you talking about WT? “Our Muslim brothers”? First of all, we ain’t your brothers, especially YOUR brothers. Secondly, what does this mean: “accustomed to life in America”? Are you aware, editors at WT: that many of the CAIR people are actually born-Americans, and probably all of them are Americans? And most of them are doing fairly well in America, and your condescending, belittling statement does nothing except to show how ridiculously low your editorial standards are.

Furthermore, WT tells CAIR (and by token of this to all the Muslims) that “The way to stop unfavorable coverage is to straighten up and fly right. Shooting the messenger, as any successful American advocacy group could tell them, never works. ”

Let me tell you, WT bigots: the way to stop unfavorable coverage from your paper is for Muslims to become once-Muslims. The only people that will make you happy are Muslim-pretenders such as Manji, and the “we are Muslims when we really are not” folks such as Ayaan Hirshi, or Wafa Sultan. And let me also tell you, that it ain’t happening! Maybe some of the proggie boys and girls at eteraz might buckle down and fulfill your requirements for ‘good Muslim boys and girls’, but the vast majority of normal Muslims will always be ‘radical’ in your sight, just like CAIR. So take your worthless, insincere and unjustified advice and mail it to AIPAC, Daniel Pipes’s ‘Campus Watch’, and your very own organization, which best exemplifies the ‘kill the messenger’ methodology. Have we forgotten what was done to Carter and to the two Professors who wrote a critical analysis of AIPAC? We haven’t.

CAIR’s statement on the editorial (a few excerpts):

Like this?
Get more of our great articles.

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 3/15/07) – A prominent national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group today called the right-wing Washington Times newspaper “beyond hypocritical” for claiming to support a “robust media” while refusing to publish responses to alleged anti-Muslim bias in its reporting and commentary.

As evidence of the Washington Times’ refusal to publish editorial responses from Muslims, CAIR cited a letter to the editor it sent to the paper earlier this week. That letter, headlined “Washington Times Seeks to Silence American Muslims,” has not appeared in that newspaper. It stated in part:

“It seems that Internet searches of extremist anti-Muslim blogs have replaced responsible journalism at the Washington Times. That can be the only explanation for the laundry list of recycled smears, distortions and outright falsehoods littered throughout S.A. Miller’s hatchet job on the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), America’s largest Islamic civil liberties group.

“CAIR is a grass-roots expression of American Muslims who resolved to rise to the challenges facing our society, namely to confront intolerance and promote justice. As the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights group, CAIR’s 32 chapters bring together Americans from every walk of life. The diversity represented by CAIR’s staff, volunteers and supporters is a reflection of the diversity of America.

“We are the same group that launched an online petition drive, called ‘Not in the Name of Islam,’ designed to demonstrate Muslim repudiation of terrorism and religious extremism. CAIR is also the group that launched a television public service announcement campaign of that same name and coordinated a ‘fatwa,’ or Islamic religious ruling, against terrorism. . .

Saylor, the author of CAIR’s letter to the Times, added: “The fact that CAIR comes under attack by anti-Muslim extremists should come as no surprise to anyone who works for positive social change. All proponents of justice, including leading organizations in America’s civil rights movement, have faced similar attacks designed to silence their voices.

7 / View Comments

7 responses to “Washington Times’s Arrogance”

  1. Hassan says:

    I am still amazed after 5-6 months since that incident, no one has explained (perhaps) to newspapers, airport authorities and airlines, that Fajr, Maghreb and Isha prayers are read aloud, and of course since we are worshipping Allah, His name would be mentioned in the prayers. And when WT says “fly right”, does it mean we should not pray? No doubt prayer is symbol of islam and imaan, and that irks kuffar most.

  2. Abdu says:

    salaam,

    “we ain’t your brothers”- I must say, I gotta love your passion Amad.

    “…they become accustomed to life in America.”- LOL, as if we all just came off a boat 5 years ago.

    Good thing I don’t read newspapers.

  3. ِAbu Bakr says:

    Akhi, we’re going to have to revoke your FOB Club membership if you keep using words like “ain’t.” Try are’nt or sha’nt. : )

  4. Amad says:

    “Akhi, we’re going to have to revoke your FOB Club membership”

    Will you please ?? :)

    I am sticking to ain’t… it has that special edge to it… and it ain’t going away.

  5. abu ameerah says:

    As’Salaamu Alaikum wa’Rahmatullah…

    let’s not forget who owns the Washington Times…the one and only Rev. Sun Myung Moon. A few years ago he said in a speech,

    “Fifteen years ago, when the world was adrift on the stormy waves of the Cold War, I established The Washington Times to fulfill God’s desperate desire to save this world. Since that time, I have devoted myself to raising up The Washington Times, hoping that this blessed land of America would fulfill its world-wide mission to build a Heavenly nation. Meanwhile, I waged a lonely struggle, facing enormous obstacles and scorn as I dedicated my whole heart and energy to enable The Washington Times to grow as a righteous and responsible journalistic institution.”

    Yeah…yeah. All of this from the self proclaimed “Messiah” of the world. Authoobillah!

  6. Manas Shaikh says:

    Brother,
    The emphatic attack on Eteraz is something we should avoid. Whatever he/they may be, they don’t denounce Islam. In fact they have their own understanding of it.

    Now to the case.

    We probably are not doing much good by trying to respond to such. Instead, in my opinion, we should focus on giving out a positive message.

    When the idolators at the Mecca created and fanned propaganda against the Prophet (S), he did not stop for them. He went on teaching message of Love and Peace. And he is an excellent example we can follow.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *