This was an article that I had written immediately after the death of Shaykh `Abd al-Aziz b. Abd Allah b. Baz – may Allah have mercy on him.
I was blessed to have the honor of meeting him a few times and asking him some questions – once I also had iftar in his house in Makkah in the month of Ramadhan. My most memorable memory with him is his visit to a group of British hujjaj in the Hajj of 1997 (1417 AH). He was sitting on a sofa, and I was at his feet (literally!) with the microphone; sitting immediately to his right was Sh. Suhaib Hassan, translating, and it was my privilege to hold the mic up and transfer it between the two of them. After half an hour of keeping my arm extended upwards, it felt like it would just fall off from exhaustion, yet out of respect for the two Shaykhs I simply could not show my tiredness; neither did I feel charitable enough to hand the mic to the brothers sitting next to me. Alhamdulillah I managed to survive (arm intact!), and at the end of the lecture, due to my strategic position, I was able to kiss the Shaykh on his forehead and make du`a for him. If ever I came close to doing tabarruk with pious saints, that was it!
Two years later, in Jan of 1999, as I was preparing for my mid-term exams of my third year at the Islamic University of Madinah, the phone rang. I picked it up; a close friend of mine said salam and asked, ‘Have you heard the news?’ I replied in the negative, but by the tone of his voice, my heart started to beat rapidly.
He just said, ‘La ilaaha illa Allah… Sh. Ibn Baaz…’ and then silence. My heart felt like it stopped beating. I will never forget that day… truly the loss of an `alim is something that only the people who appreciate knowledge can understand.
The article was written a few days after his death; I have left it as it was written, unedited, despite the fact that I feel it requires some improvement in language and style.
A number of people sent me queries concerning the correct opinion on praying Salaat al-Janaazah in absentia (on a person who is not present). The question was obviously relevant since people all over the world prayed salaat al-janaazah for Shaykh Ibn Baz rahimahullah.
Before I breifly answer the question, I would like to mention the fact that this occurence (that so many millions of people prayed over Sh. Ibn Baz) is in and of itself an indication insha-Allah of the status and sincerity of the Shaykh. As some of the salaf said: The criterion between the person of sunnah and the person of bida’ah is the janaazah; meaning that Allah az wa jal blesses the scholar of the sunnah to have many people pray for his forgiveness. The janaazah of Imam Ahmad was attended by more than a hundred thousand people, according to some reports, and for that time and age that is an astounding figure.
In the janaazah prayer of Sh. Ibn Baz, it was estimated that over a million people were present in the haram, and over fifty-thousand accompanied the bier to the grave. Also, all over the Kingdom, by Royal Decree, every single masjid prayed the salaat on the Shaykh after salaat al-Jumu’ah. I attended the prayer in the Prophet’s Masjid, where Sh. al-Qaasimi (the grandson of the one who compiled Majmu’ al-Fatawa) gave a short but eloquent khutbah, in which he praised knowledge, and the people of knowledge, and mentioned Sh. Ibn Baz, and his qualities, and the loss that this was to the ummah. People were openly crying…
One point that the Sh. did mention, however, and I felt that this was a very important point, is that people should not despair, for there will always be good in the ummah as long as there are scholars and students of knowledge. He also emphasized the fact that the death of Sh. Ibn Baaz should cause all of us to ponder over the status of knowledge in our lives, and how important it is that all of us -each and every one of us – must do his best to try to fill the large vacuum that is left.
The point that I was trying to make was that I believe this is the first time in history where so many people have prayed over a single person – literally millions and millions of people world-wide. This not to mention the fact that people of all statuses, kings (King Fahad and the royal princes all came to Makkah to pray), dignitaries of all nationalities, scholars (Sh. Uthaymeen, Sh. Subayil,… even Qardawi came to Makkah!) and average people, the vast majority of whom had not even met the Shaykh… yet their hearts will filled with love for him, and great sadness at his death… This is something that can only come through the blessings of Allah subhaanahu wa ta’alaa, no amount of publicity, or writing, or speeches, or fatwas, can make a person achieve such a status. The only way this comes about (and this was something that Sh. al-Qasimi mentioned) is when a person sticks to the sunnah, and increases his sincerty to Allah, and makes his dawah, to Allah, for Allah, and by the commandments of Allah. Then, and only then, will his dawah be blessed, and the people will accept him, and love him…
Verily, the death of Sh. Ibn Baaz is something that causes the hearts to melt, and the eyes to cry, and the souls to despair… but to Allah we belong, and to Him we will return. We pray that Allah blesses us with more scholars, and helps us all to increase in knowledge. Ameen
Concerning the fiqhi question that was posed, briefly, there are two opinions on the issue. Before mentioning them, it is relevant to mention that the only occurrence in the sunnah of salaat al-janaazah in absentia is when the Prophet (S) prayed for Najaashi, the ruler of Abyssinia, the same day that he died. This incident is reported in Bukhari and Muslim
The first opinion is that of the Hanafees and Malikees, and is that it is not permissable to pray over a person who is not present. Ibn Aabideen states in his famous Haashyiyah (v. 3, p. 99): “And of the conditions of the janaazah salaat … is that the body be placed in front of the Imaam…so it is not permissable upon one who is absent (ghai’ib). As for the Prophet’s prayer upon Najashi, then it is interpreted that … this was a speciality only allowed for him (khusoosiyyah)… another proof for this is that many of the Companions died during his lifetime, but it is not reported that he prayed for any of them.” al-Khaleeli says in his Matn (v. 3, p. 71 of al-Mawaahib al-Jaleel): And it is not permissable to pray for… one who is absent (gha’ib).
The second opinion is that of the Dhahirees, Hanbalees and the Shafi’ees. They hold that it is allowed to pray over a person in absentia, and claim that the prayer of the Prophet (S) over Najashi was not a speciality only for him. Imaam an-Nawawi states in his Rawdat at-Talibeen (v. 2, p. 130), “And it is permissable to perform the salaat in absentia.” Ibn Hazm states in his al-Muhalla (v. 5, p. 138) “And a dead Muslim is prayed over even in absentia.” The Hanbalees, however, add a condition. Ibn Qudaamah says in his Mughni (v. 4. p. 446), “And it is permissable to pray the salaat in absentia… upto one month of the person’s death.”
The reason for this difference of opinion is whether the prayer of the Prophet (s) over Najashi was something that was special for him or not? Those that claim that it was, say that Allah caused the earth to ‘swallow up’, and so the Prophet (S) could see Najashi in front of him. However, this is not authentically narrated in any hadith, so it cannot be accepted. Also, as it is well known in the science of usool al-fiqh, to claim that something is special for the Prophet (S) requires evidence and clear proof, and in this case there is none. So between these two opinions, the stronger one without any doubt is the second one, i.e., that it is allowed to pray the janaazah prayer in absentia.
However, the scholars who allowed this type of prayer themselves differed over the conditions concerning when this was allowed.There are three opinions that I have come across (if anyone comes across any more, please forward them to me).
The majority of them, and this is what the madh-hab of the Hanbalees and Shafi’ees is upon, is that there is no condition whatsoever. So, even if a person has been prayed over, it is still allowed to pray for him in another country. This is also the opinion of as-Shawkaani (Nayl al-Awtaar, v. 4, p. 63).
Some scholars, amongst them Shaykh Ibn Baaz himself, and the opinion of the Hay’at Kibaar al-Ulaama of the Kingdom, stated that this was to be done only when the person that died was of a high status, and had aided Islam, such as a just king, or a scholar. (See Fatawa al-Lajnat ad-Da’imah, v. 8, p. 418, fatwa # 5394). Shaykh Uthaymeen says of this opinion, “This is a middle opinion (between the two extreme opinions) which many modern and past scholars have chosen.” (Sharh al-Mumti, v. 5, p. 438).
The last opinion is that of Shaykh al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah and others, who stated that this was only to be done when a person died without having a janazah performed on him. So, for example, when a person dies in a non-Muslim country, and there are no Muslims to pray for him, then in this case the salaat should be performed for him.
Now, the reason for the difference of opinion concerning these conditions is: What was the reason (‘illah) due to which the Prophet (S) prayed for Najashi? Was it to show that it was permissable (which is what the first group says), and thus allowed for everyone? Was it due to the fact that Najashi was an important person (the second group)? Or, was it due to the fact that he was the only Muslim in the country, and none of the people prayed for him (the third group)?
In my humble opinion, the first opinion is the weakest. This is becuase it is well-known that many of the Companions died outside of Madinah during the lifetime of the Prophet (S), but he did not pray for any of them (to be more accurate, there are no authentic reports that he prayed for other Companions. There are some week reports that he prayed for some Companions that died outside of Madinah, cf. Nayl al-Awtar, v. 3, p. 62). Had it been something encouraged, the Prophet (S) would not have left it for no reason, especially since he was so eager to pray for his Companions. He said concerning the old, black woman that used to clean the masjid and whom the Companions buried at night without telling him, “Why did you not inform me? For verily my Salaat upon them is a mercy…” and he went to her grave and prayed over her. So, this shows that he would not have left the janaazah prayer upon such Companions for no reason.
Therefore, it seems as if one of the last two opinions is the correct one. Both of these opinions have very good reasons (‘illah) for them. It can be said that the Prophet (s) prayed for Najashi because of his status, and to show that a person who has helped Islam (since Najashi sheltered the Muslims who emigrated to his country) should be given the honour of having janaazah performed on him in abenstia. It can also be stated that since Najashi was the only Muslim, and no one prayed for him, the Prophet (S) prayed for him.
In my humble opinion, between these two opinions it cannot be stated with one-hundred percent certainty which of the two is correct. This is because it is a matter of ijtihaad what the exact reason behind the Prophet (S) praying janaazah over Najashi was. Also, Ibn Qudaamah brings a very good point. He states (al-Mughni, v. 3, p. 336) “… they (the ‘other side’) state that since no-one prayed over Najashi (this was why the Prophet (S) prayed over him)…. but this is very improbable, for Najashi was the King of the Abyssinians, and he accepted Islam and openly proclaimed it, so it seems very improbable that no-one would have followed him (in accepting Islam), and (therefore) not pray over him.”
In other words, what is the evidence that no one prayed over Najashi? There are no reports to the contrary (ie., that no one prayed over him). Also, as Ibn Qudaamah points out, it does seem unrealistic that Najashi, who was so loved by his people, and who openly accepted Islam and helped the Prophet (S), would not have succeeded in converting some of his people, and thus there would have been some Muslims to pray over him. So, based on these facts, perhaps the second opinion (that it should be prayed over a person of status) is more realistic.
On the other hand, it could be argued that no mention is made of these Abyssinian converts (if they ever existed), and also there are no reports in the books of Islamic history concerning these people, and what happened to them or their progeny. Therefore, if no mention is made of them, then there is no evidence to suggest that they exist, and anyone who claims that they did must bring forth his proof! So, in light of this reason, the third opinion (that it should only be prayed over a person for whom janaazah has not been prayed) seems to be more realstic!
So, which of the two opinions is correct? Like I stated earlier, it really seems difficult to defend one over the other. (Therefore, I would advise the brothers, even if they follow another opinion, not to cause a fitnah when some people do pray salaat al-janaazah over a famous person, as long as that person was one who helped Islam).
However, perhaps the second opinion has some slight weight over the third one (please note the emphasis!!!)
On what basis, though? Well, both sides put forth a statement that they use to justify their opinion.
The second group (those that say the ‘person of status’ condition) states: Najashi was a just Muslim ruler, who aided and helped the Muslims, and therefore the Prophet (S) prayed for him. The third group states: Najashi was the only Muslim in his country, and was not prayed over.
Now, it could be stated: The statement of the second group is an indisputable fact. All the books of history mention this. The statement of the third group, however, is not fact, and is based on circumstantial evidence. Nowhere does it state that no one accepted Islam, or that Najashi was not prayed over. These are only presumptions. and no evidence can be brought forth to support it. Therefore, since the second group is basing their opinion on an indisputable fact, whereas the third one is basing it on disputable opinion, perhaps the second group has some slight advantage in the opinion that they hold, and therefore it is allowed, even encouraged, to pray over someone who helped and aided Islam, whether the body is in front of the group, or in absentia.
And Allah subhaanahu wa ta’aala knows best!!!
PS I would be interested in hearing other opinions as well. If anyone has any other evidences, or can shed light on other perspectives, please forward them here. Also, there is no copyright on this ‘article’, so forward as you please.