News and Views
CNN: Why is Harvard honoring bigotry?
Keep supporting MuslimMatters for the sake of Allah
Alhamdulillah, we're at over 850 supporters. Help us get to 900 supporters this month. All it takes is a small gift from a reader like you to keep us going, for just $2 / month.
The Prophet (SAW) has taught us the best of deeds are those that done consistently, even if they are small. Click here to support MuslimMatters with a monthly donation of $2 per month. Set it and collect blessings from Allah (swt) for the khayr you're supporting without thinking about it.
-
#Culture1 month ago
[Podcast] How To Free A Jinn & Other Questions | Ustadha Raidah Shah Idil
-
#Islam1 month ago
Study Classical Texts The Traditional Way [Session 3] | Sh. Yaser Birjas
-
#Life4 weeks ago
Ensuring The Safety Of Our Communities: A Call For Immediate Corrective Action From American Muslim Organizations
-
#Life1 month ago
Processing Spiritual Abuse In Islam: A Comprehensive Guide For Individuals, Communities, And Organizations
julie
September 26, 2010 at 2:19 PM
CAIR is set to honor Helen Thomas. We know CAIR would not be honoring someone who said Arabs or Muslims should go back to where they come from. Is Ms Syed taking them to task for this? They said they are judging her from her whole career nor from a few comments. .
Harvard is doing the same. Ms Syed has a lot of nerve to turn a blind eye to the huge amount of people-from Helen Thomas to Jesse Jackson- who are honored despite their despicable remarks. Columbia invited PResident Ahmadejad to speak- did Ms Syed protest that and claim that “Columbia wasw honoring anti-semitism?” If not, she really has nothing to complain about now. Just self serving censorship.
April
September 27, 2010 at 5:09 AM
Welcome to the world Julie.
Groups should advocate for their own protection, interest, and rights; and that has to be defined in light of principles we can, in all our diversity, hold in common.
I’d much rather we transcend bickering and define those principles that serve everyone, so that no one group is able to repress another, degrade those principals, or use the law as bodyguard for their own, personal, fiat.
Who can any more afford the luxury of any group considering itself the ONLY one, in such a complex and dangerous world.
Isn’t that what you’re saying? Does this include your group, as you so define it?