The Death Knell of Academic Freedom and Intellectual Debate at Harvard

Dr. Claudine Gay’s resignation as president of Harvard University indicates the devaluing of academic freedom and intellectual thought. This is an ominous blow to academia for many reasons.

Free speech and intellectual debate in academia have always bowed down, to some degree, to financial and political pressures. It is, in reality, a business. Those who aspire to climb the ladders of achievement in these environments must be aware that people with special interests are always standing at the bottom of the ladder trying to shake it. Political special interests may jolt the ladder. Financial pressures turn those jolts into seismic convulsions.

Institutions of higher learning have traditionally been the incubators of innovative thought. It is where our best intellectuals are nurtured and mentored, challenged and refuted. It is not a place where dissenting or controversial opinions are silenced.  Dr. Gay’s hesitation to blanketly condemn students who shout, “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” shows that she understands that the meaning of that slogan varies depending on who is saying it and its context. We cannot allow one group of powerful people to impose their interpretation of its meaning upon the powerless, especially not in an academic setting.

During the farcical hearing, Dr. Gay would not emphatically condemn the Harvard students who exercised their freedom of speech. Not only did the highly reactive and emotional examiner ask loaded questions, but she also supplied her own “politically correct” answers in the next breath. What we witnessed was a modern-day Salem witch trial combined with a hefty dose of McCarthyism. How then can educators hope to speak and write freely with such a threat of censure, ostracization, and termination looming?

This “plagiarism claim” highlights a new tactic in right-wing attacks directed at higher education. The accusation didn’t originate from fellow academics but rather from Gay’s political adversaries. Those critical of Gay alleged that her appointment to the top position, despite her impressive academic background with a PhD in government, professorships at Harvard and Stanford, and leadership at Harvard’s largest division, was largely influenced by her identity as a Black woman.

Christopher Rufo, a conservative activist involved in orchestrating this effort, hailed Gay’s departure as a triumph in his ongoing campaign against prestigious higher education institutions. On X, formerly Twitter, he jubilantly stated “SCALPED,” referencing a grim historical practice adopted by white colonists aiming to eradicate Native Americans.

Billionaire Bill Ackman is another anti-DEI crusader against President Gay playing the antisemite card. The big bucks donor who is made because he didn’t get to decide how his donations would be used, posted a letter on X that he sent to Harvard’s governing boards claiming that during Gay’s “short tenure” as president, Gay “has done more damage to the reputation of Harvard University than any individual in our nearly 500-year history.” Seems like he is mad, Gay didn’t jump high enough when he said jump.

Dr. Gay will remain a professor at Harvard, despite being subjected to personal attacks and threats fueled by racial animosity.

Gay, whose tenure lasted just over six months, is the second Ivy League president to resign amid criticism of anti-Semitism at US colleges. University of Pennsylvania President Liz Magill had resigned last month after criticism and pressure following her remarks at the congressional hearing.

Henry Giroux, a founding theorist in the field of critical pedagogy, has written  about the challenge to academic freedom, saying, “While the universities are increasingly corporatized and militarized, their governing structures are becoming more authoritarian, faculty are being devalued as public intellectuals, students are viewed as clients, academic fields are treated as economic domains for providing credentials and workplace skills, and academic freedom is under assault.”

His words are truthful.

By the way, with the level of vetting that usually occurs during the hiring process and publishing, I refuse to believe that Harvard and all the other “distinguished” institutions that published Dr. Gay’s works did not detect plagiarism before the hearing. Someone has dropped the white ball.

Related:

Activism for Palestine in the West: Understanding the Agreement of Joe Biden and Jordan Peterson on Israel