The mysterious case of the grey lady of Bagram

By Robert Fisk

Saturday, 20 Mar, 2010

Why didn't Aafia Siddiqui's family report her missing in 2003, asks Robert Fisk.

ISLAMABAD: Dr Shams Hassan Faruqi sits amid his rocks and geological records, shakes his bearded head and stares at me. “I strongly doubt if the children are alive,” he says. “Probably, they have expired.” He says this in a strange way, mournful but resigned, yet somehow he seems oddly unmoved. As a witness, supposedly, to the mysterious 2008 re-appearance of Aafia Siddiqui – the “most wanted woman in the world”, according to former US attorney general John Ashcroft – I guess this 73-year-old Pakistani geologist is used to the limelight. But the children, I ask him again. What happened to the children?

Dr Faruqi is Aafia Siddiqui's uncle and he produces a photograph of his niece at the age of 13, picnicking in the Margalla hills above Islamabad, a smiling girl in a yellow shalwar khameez, half-leaning against a tree. She does not look like the stuff of which Al-Qaeda operatives are made. Yet she is now a semi-icon in Pakistan, a country which may well have been involved in her original kidnapping and which now oh-so-desperately wants her back from an American prison. Her children, weirdly, disconcertingly, have been forgotten.

Aafia Siddiqui's story is now as famous in Pakistan as it is notorious in a New York City courtroom where her trial for trying to kill an American soldier in the Afghan city of Ghazni in 2008 – she was convicted this month and faces a minimum of 20 years in prison on just one of the charges against her – is regarded as a symbol of American injustice. “Shame on America,” posters scream in all of Pakistan's major cities. She is known as the “grey lady of Bagram”, supposedly tortured for five years in America's cruel Afghan prison. President Asif Ali Zardari has asked American envoy Richard Holbrooke to repatriate Siddiqui under the Pakistan-US prisoner exchange scheme, while the Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani has dubbed her a “daughter of the nation”. Opposition leader Nawaz Sharif promises to demand her release. But none of them mention the children. Ahmed, Sulieman and Maryam are their names.

Ahmed was returned to Pakistan from Afghanistan in 2008, but Dr Faruqi tells me he doesn't believe for a moment that it is Aafia Siddiqui's son. “He came here to stay with me, but he said he didn't know Aafia until he was taken to Ghazni. He said to me: 'I was in the big earthquake in Afghanistan and my brothers and sisters were killed in their home while I was out fetching water – that's what saved my life.' He told me that after the earthquake, he was put in an orphanage in Kabul. He was shown a photograph of my niece Aafia and said he did not know this lady, that he had never seen her before. Then he was taken to Ghazni and told to sit next to this woman – my niece. The boy is intelligent. He is simple. He is honest.”

All such mysteries require a “story-so-far”. It goes like this. Aafia Siddiqui, a 38-year-old neuroscientist, an MIT alumna and Brandeis university PhD, disappeared after leaving her sister's home for Karachi airport in 2003, taking Ahmed, Sulieman and Maryam with her. The Americans say she was a leading Al-Qaeda operative. So does her ex-husband. She had re-married Ammar al-Baluchi, currently in Guantanamo Bay, a cousin of Ramzi Yousef who was convicted for the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing. Not, you might, say, a healthy curriculum vitae in the West's obsessive “war on terror”. In 2004, the UN identified her as an Al-Qaeda operative.

But released inmates from the notorious American prison at Bagram near Kabul– where torture is commonplace and at least three prisoners have been murdered – have stated that there was a woman held there, a woman whose nightly screams prompted them to go on hunger strike. She was dubbed the “grey lady of Bagram”. At her New York trial, Siddiqui demanded that Jewish members of the jury be dismissed, she fired her own defence lawyers who said she had become unbalanced after torture; Siddiqui blurted out that she had been tortured in secret prisons before her arrest. “If you were in a secret prison … where children were murdered…” she said.

And so to the town of Ghazni, south of Kabul. It was here that Afghan police stopped her in 2008, carrying a handbag which supposedly contained details of chemical weapons and radiological agents, notes on mass casualty attacks on US targets and maps of Ghazni. American soldiers and FBI agents were summoned to question her and arrived in Ghazni without realising that Siddiqui was in the same room, sitting behind a curtain. According to their evidence, she managed to take one of their M-4 assault rifles and opened fire. She missed but was cut down by two bullets from a 9mm pistol fired by one of the soldiers. Hence the charges. Hence the conviction.

She wasn't helped by an alleged statement by Khalid Sheikh Muhammad – the man who supposedly planned 9/11 and who is the uncle of her second husband, Ammar al-Baluchi – who claimed that Aafia Siddiqui was a senior Al-Qaeda agent. But then, he'd just been waterboarded 183 times in a month – which hardly makes his evidence, to use a phrase, water-tight.

The questions are obvious. What on earth was a Pakistani American with a Brandeis degree doing in Ghazni with a handbag containing American targets? And why, if her family was so fearful for her, didn't they report her missing in 2003, go to the press and tell the story of the children? Ahmed – son of Siddiqui or Afghan orphan, depending on your point of view – is now staying with Siddiqui's sister, Fauzia, in Karachi; but she refuses to let him talk to journalists. The Americans have shown no interest in him – even less in the other two, younger children. Why not?

It's odd, to say the least, that Dr Faruqi also maintains that in 2008 – before the Ghazni incident – Aafia Siddiqui turned up at his home in the suburbs of Islamabad. “She was wearing a burqa and got out of the car, just outside here,” he says, pointing to the tree-lined street outside his office window. “I only caught sight of her once, and I said 'You have changed your nose'. But it was her. We talked about the past, her memories, it was her voice. She said the ISI (the Inter-Services Intelligence) had let her come here. She wanted to get away, to go back to Afghanistan where she said the Taliban would protect her. She said that since her arrest, she knew nothing of her children. Someone told her they had been sent to Australia.”

More questions. If Siddiqui was a “ghost prisoner” in Afghanistan, how come she turned up at Dr Faruqi's home in Islamabad? Why would she wear an Afghan “burqa” in the cosmopolitan capital of her own country? Why did she not talk more about her children? Why could she not show her face to her own uncle? Did she really come to Islamabad?

Fauzia Siddiqui is now touring Pakistan to publicise her sister's “unfair” trial, her torture at the hands of Americans. Most of the Pakistan press have taken up her story with little critical attention to the allegations against her. She has become a proto-martyr, a martyr-in-being; if her story is comprehensible, it requires a willing suspension of disbelief. But America's constant protestations of ignorance about her whereabouts before 2008 have an unhappy ring about them.

And the children? Rarely written about in Pakistan, they, too, in a sense, were “disappeared” from the story – until the Afghan President, Hamid Karzai, paid an uneasy visit to Pakistan this week and, according to Fauzia, told the Interior minister, Rehman Malik, that “the children of Aafia Siddiqui will be sent home soon”. Was Karzai referring to the other two children? Or to all three, including the “real” Ahmed? And if Aafia's two/three children are in Afghanistan, where have they been kept? In an orphanage? In a prison? And who kept them? The Afghans? The Americans?

Dawn/The Independent News Service

10 Responses

  1. hamayoun

    Salam

    Interesting article. I did find one flaw:

    “And why, if her family was so fearful for her, didn’t they report her missing in 2003, go to the press and tell the story of the children?”

    They did report her missing, I remember this very well. Her mother said she was visited by a man who told her to keep quiet if she wanted Aafia back. This was just before that toerag Ashcroft branded her a terrorist.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Reply
  2. Muslim Stranger

    Plus the police in Pakistan were not writing FIRs of Missing People. They have just started recording of FIRs after the re-establishment of Judiciary in Pakistan.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Reply
  3. Muslim Stranger

    And FIR about Aafia Siddiqui was recorded just 1 or 2 months ago.
    Even though her sister Dr. Fuazia sent hundreds of applications since 2003

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Reply
  4. Olivia

    i feel so sad for this woman and her children. may Allah have mercy upon them all. it really breaks my heart to read about this. may Allah grant her justice in this life and the next.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Reply
  5. Waris

    @ “Why didn’t Aafia Siddiqui’s family report her missing in 2003″

    What on earth is the matter with people!!!. How does reporting or not affect the case?? Whats the relevance.
    Assuming that famliy did not report, does this give us the permission to rape, torture and abuse ???.
    I guess some people have lost it !!!

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Reply
    • Mohammad

      Waris, you may not be aware of the Pakistani anti-Aafia group, but there are sizeable numbers of them. They are generally Musharraf supporters, and once it was proven that he was aware of the kidnapping, they chaned their stance from denial to one of framing her as a terrorist.

      Numerous Pakistani Musharraf supporters have asked me “Surely she is guilty, else why did the US catch her, when they are not catching thousands of other Muslim women they could ahve caught”

      Their worship of one whisky drinking figure has made them oblivious to everything else.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      Reply
  6. Joseph

    Ms. Oprah Winfrey
    1058 West Washington Blvd
    Chicago, Il 60607

    Emergency emergency

    Ms. Winfrey

    My name Joseph Morris, American citizen stranded in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Ms. Winfrey I came to Saudi Arabia on business and quest for answers to questions that I have about Islam questions like should I stay in Islam Should I return Roman Catholic Church. I have seen so much racism people saying word (Nigger) I have just seen to much I have sent question to people of knowledge they just refuse to answer my questions. Ms. Winfrey I have (8) years old son who live in Kuwait with his Kuwaiti mother she very good mother I love my son very much I just cannot keep living like this when people dislike me because color of skin I have sent letter to President Barrack Obama asking for his assistance. U.S. Consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia refuses to assist because I’m American Muslim I have done no wrong. Ms. Winfrey can you please help me contact President Obama. Ms. Winfrey I’m stranded in Jeddah Saudi Arabia I have try to contact members Saudi Royal family no responds Ms. Winfrey I can send my letter direct to your office once I have responds this my contact information in Jeddah Mobile: 966-556375415/ email: abdulazizusa@gmail.com mardarmors@aol.com

    Best regards,

    Joseph Morris

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.