

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Simple Matter of Disagreement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/</link>
	<description>Discourses in the Intellectual Traditions, Political Situation, and Social Ethics of Muslim Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaykh Haitham al-Haddad &#171; Bayt ul-Hikma &#8211; House of Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-43681</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaykh Haitham al-Haddad &#171; Bayt ul-Hikma &#8211; House of Wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 20:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-43681</guid>
		<description>[...] - http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; <a href="http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/" rel="nofollow">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abu Abdurrahman</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Abdurrahman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 12:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>Bismillahir rahmanir raheem..

I&#039;ve been bussy with exams, so I can&#039;t write anything of any significant length - but if one looks at the arguments in a holistic manner, I think one will more likely than not come to the conclusion that the shuroot attached (mta&#039;alliq) to the issue &quot;idealistic notions&quot;and of &quot;no tangible benefit&quot; for most intents and purposes, as put by Shaykh Haitham. 

And Allah azza wa jall truely knows best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bismillahir rahmanir raheem..</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been bussy with exams, so I can&#8217;t write anything of any significant length &#8211; but if one looks at the arguments in a holistic manner, I think one will more likely than not come to the conclusion that the shuroot attached (mta&#8217;alliq) to the issue &#8220;idealistic notions&#8221;and of &#8220;no tangible benefit&#8221; for most intents and purposes, as put by Shaykh Haitham. </p>
<p>And Allah azza wa jall truely knows best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umm Layth</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Umm Layth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>Inexplicabletimelessness: There is more to this issue then a principle you learned at a class. There are actually texts for those who say ma&#039;azif are permissible. The majority may disagree because of other proofs, but those who oppose them too have their arguments to the proofs against them. So in such a case, it isn&#039;t as clear cut as you may try to make it.

http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=1&amp;ID=1793&amp;CATE=142</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inexplicabletimelessness: There is more to this issue then a principle you learned at a class. There are actually texts for those who say ma&#8217;azif are permissible. The majority may disagree because of other proofs, but those who oppose them too have their arguments to the proofs against them. So in such a case, it isn&#8217;t as clear cut as you may try to make it.</p>
<p><a href="http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=1&#038;ID=1793&#038;CATE=142" rel="nofollow">http://qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=1&#038;ID=1793&#038;CATE=142</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inexplicabletimelessness</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3280</link>
		<dc:creator>inexplicabletimelessness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 04:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3280</guid>
		<description>Also, one fundamental principle we learned in the AlMaghrib Usul Al-Fiqh class by Sh. Yaser Birjas was that: 

There can be NO Ijtihad against the texts (Qur&#039;an and Sunnah), period. 

It&#039;s something which seems pretty obvious, but sadly, it seems, many people are ignorant of it. 

May Allah guide me and all of us, and forgive our sins, big and small, ameen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, one fundamental principle we learned in the AlMaghrib Usul Al-Fiqh class by Sh. Yaser Birjas was that: </p>
<p>There can be NO Ijtihad against the texts (Qur&#8217;an and Sunnah), period. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s something which seems pretty obvious, but sadly, it seems, many people are ignorant of it. </p>
<p>May Allah guide me and all of us, and forgive our sins, big and small, ameen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abu Bakr</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3276</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Bakr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3276</guid>
		<description>I have read it. He mentions the arguments and evidences for both sides. His conclusion is that it is a doubtful matter at the least and should be avoided. He also states songs which contain enticement of one&#039;s lusts or other eviles, etc. are a tool of the Shaytan which cause affliction in a person&#039;s religion, even if he is the greatest of worshippers.

His only solid conclusion that he reaches concerning the matter is that the claim of consensus does not hold up. As for the view that it is permissible to listen to music, it does not seem that he actually endorsed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read it. He mentions the arguments and evidences for both sides. His conclusion is that it is a doubtful matter at the least and should be avoided. He also states songs which contain enticement of one&#8217;s lusts or other eviles, etc. are a tool of the Shaytan which cause affliction in a person&#8217;s religion, even if he is the greatest of worshippers.</p>
<p>His only solid conclusion that he reaches concerning the matter is that the claim of consensus does not hold up. As for the view that it is permissible to listen to music, it does not seem that he actually endorsed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Umm Layth</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>Umm Layth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>Have any of you read the section in Imam al-Shawkaani&#039;s Nayl al-Awtar that he dedicates to this issue, wherein he mentions those scholars that held that musical instruments (yes, with conditions) were permissible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have any of you read the section in Imam al-Shawkaani&#8217;s Nayl al-Awtar that he dedicates to this issue, wherein he mentions those scholars that held that musical instruments (yes, with conditions) were permissible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amad</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3274</link>
		<dc:creator>Amad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3274</guid>
		<description>The fundamentals set forth here by Sh. Haitham apply to many other issues where this notion of &#039;difference of opinion&#039; is used freely to adopt and practice the strangest of notions and to deny established principles. w/s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fundamentals set forth here by Sh. Haitham apply to many other issues where this notion of &#8216;difference of opinion&#8217; is used freely to adopt and practice the strangest of notions and to deny established principles. w/s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ibnabeeomar</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3273</link>
		<dc:creator>ibnabeeomar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 17:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>mashallah amazing!!!!! this is one of the best article&#039;s ive read</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mashallah amazing!!!!! this is one of the best article&#8217;s ive read</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor @ I J T E M A</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor @ I J T E M A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 05:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>Assalamu &#039;alaykum wa rahmatullah
I pray that you are in the best of health &amp; imaan.
This is a short message to notify you that this entry has been selected for publishing on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ijtema.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I J T E M A&lt;/a&gt;; a venture to highlight the best of the Muslim blogosphere.
To find out more about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ijtema.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I J T E M A&lt;/a&gt;, and how you can further contribute, please click &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ijtema.net/about-ijtemanet/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
May Allah bless you for your noble efforts.
Wa&#039;salam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assalamu &#8216;alaykum wa rahmatullah<br />
I pray that you are in the best of health &amp; imaan.<br />
This is a short message to notify you that this entry has been selected for publishing on <a href="http://www.ijtema.net" rel="nofollow">I J T E M A</a>; a venture to highlight the best of the Muslim blogosphere.<br />
To find out more about <a href="http://www.ijtema.net" rel="nofollow">I J T E M A</a>, and how you can further contribute, please click <a href="http://www.ijtema.net/about-ijtemanet/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.<br />
May Allah bless you for your noble efforts.<br />
Wa&#8217;salam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: inexplicabletimelessness</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3260</link>
		<dc:creator>inexplicabletimelessness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 20:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/06/02/a-simple-matter-of-disagreement/#comment-3260</guid>
		<description>MashaAllah, a really objective and insightful article. JazakAllah khair for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MashaAllah, a really objective and insightful article. JazakAllah khair for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

