

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wahhabi Myth: Debunking the Bogeyman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/</link>
	<description>Discourses in the Intellectual Traditions, Political Situation, and Social Ethics of Muslim Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Wahhabi Myth: Debunking the Bogeyman &#124; MuslimMatters.org -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-79651</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Wahhabi Myth: Debunking the Bogeyman &#124; MuslimMatters.org -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-79651</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sara Bridge, Samina Rahman. Samina Rahman said: What is a Wahhabi? http://tinyurl.com/r2s3u6 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sara Bridge, Samina Rahman. Samina Rahman said: What is a Wahhabi? <a href="http://tinyurl.com/r2s3u6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/r2s3u6</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Elijah</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-69741</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Elijah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-69741</guid>
		<description>Assalaamu &#039;Alaikum
In intra-Muslims discourse, the term &#039;fundamentalist&#039; is historically new. I have heard non-Muslims using the term to refer to any &#039;classical interpretation of Islam&#039;. So, if someone calls me a &#039;fundamentalist&#039; if i adhere to &#039;classical interpretation of Islam&#039; than this term is no more a term of opprobrium for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assalaamu &#8216;Alaikum<br />
In intra-Muslims discourse, the term &#8216;fundamentalist&#8217; is historically new. I have heard non-Muslims using the term to refer to any &#8216;classical interpretation of Islam&#8217;. So, if someone calls me a &#8216;fundamentalist&#8217; if i adhere to &#8216;classical interpretation of Islam&#8217; than this term is no more a term of opprobrium for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Elijah</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-69738</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Elijah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-69738</guid>
		<description>Just because a term is used to describe a group of people negatively in terms of their Islamic interpretations does not necessarily make those who express it to be wrong or unIslamic as you seem to imply.

A Muslim deserves respect and it is unIslamic to describe negatively a difference of Fiqh interpretation. In fact, we should describe negatively a difference of &#039;Aqeedah interpretation. And I don&#039;t think Imam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab had an &#039;Aqeedah different from Fuqahaa like Imam Abu Haneefah rahimahullaah and Muhadditheen like Imam Bukhaari rahimahullaah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because a term is used to describe a group of people negatively in terms of their Islamic interpretations does not necessarily make those who express it to be wrong or unIslamic as you seem to imply.</p>
<p>A Muslim deserves respect and it is unIslamic to describe negatively a difference of Fiqh interpretation. In fact, we should describe negatively a difference of &#8216;Aqeedah interpretation. And I don&#8217;t think Imam Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab had an &#8216;Aqeedah different from Fuqahaa like Imam Abu Haneefah rahimahullaah and Muhadditheen like Imam Bukhaari rahimahullaah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Elijah</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-69737</link>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Elijah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 10:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-69737</guid>
		<description>Assalaamu &#039;Alaikum

I am a Sunni but I admit that the word Wahhabi has prejudicial connotations unlike the word Hanafi as I am.
A more appropriate term would be Zahiri who have the same &#039;Aqeedah as Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa&#039;ah but the Fiqh is Fiqh Zahiriyyah. This approach can lead to a respectful dialogue with brothers who Zahiri Fiqh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Assalaamu &#8216;Alaikum</p>
<p>I am a Sunni but I admit that the word Wahhabi has prejudicial connotations unlike the word Hanafi as I am.<br />
A more appropriate term would be Zahiri who have the same &#8216;Aqeedah as Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa&#8217;ah but the Fiqh is Fiqh Zahiriyyah. This approach can lead to a respectful dialogue with brothers who Zahiri Fiqh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LES: Tahir al Qadri Issues &#8220;Fatwa&#8221;, Stereotypes Deobandis &#38; &#8220;Wahhabis&#8221; &#124; MuslimMatters.org</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-61242</link>
		<dc:creator>LES: Tahir al Qadri Issues &#8220;Fatwa&#8221;, Stereotypes Deobandis &#38; &#8220;Wahhabis&#8221; &#124; MuslimMatters.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-61242</guid>
		<description>[...] good post on this, extracting Tahir&#8217;s own agenda against deobandis (and of course the &#8220;wahhabi bogeyman&#8220;). See source below. Tahir&#8217;s quote against deobandis reminds me of the typical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good post on this, extracting Tahir&#8217;s own agenda against deobandis (and of course the &#8220;wahhabi bogeyman&#8220;). See source below. Tahir&#8217;s quote against deobandis reminds me of the typical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AsimG</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59582</link>
		<dc:creator>AsimG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59582</guid>
		<description>We are called Muslim in the Qur&#039;an, not salafi.

Shaykh Yasir spoke of the history of the term and its initial intentions in a class.  
I am only relaying what he has previously said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are called Muslim in the Qur&#8217;an, not salafi.</p>
<p>Shaykh Yasir spoke of the history of the term and its initial intentions in a class.<br />
I am only relaying what he has previously said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amad</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59581</link>
		<dc:creator>Amad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 07:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59581</guid>
		<description>Yes, he avoids it. In general, he avoids most labels other than ahl-sunnah wal jamaah.  I think most people are aware of why the label has become loaded and in some sense, caustic. Doesn&#039;t mean the term is bad, but when terms start taking lives of their own, then it is best to stick to the most basic and comprehensive term.

And if Sh. Yasir wishes to clarify more, he&#039;ll do so. No need to prod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, he avoids it. In general, he avoids most labels other than ahl-sunnah wal jamaah.  I think most people are aware of why the label has become loaded and in some sense, caustic. Doesn&#8217;t mean the term is bad, but when terms start taking lives of their own, then it is best to stick to the most basic and comprehensive term.</p>
<p>And if Sh. Yasir wishes to clarify more, he&#8217;ll do so. No need to prod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abd- Allah</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59574</link>
		<dc:creator>Abd- Allah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59574</guid>
		<description>Are you the shaykh&#039;s secretary akhi?

I hope what you are saying isn&#039;t true, that he avoids using the word &quot;salafi&quot; because it has a negative connotation to some people. The word &quot;Muslim&quot; has a negative connotation to some people as well, are we also going to avoid using it? If people have misconceptions about something, we clear out those misconceptions for them, not change who we are because of a misconception.

I&#039;m sure you have misunderstood Shaykh Yasir because I don&#039;t think that he calls for us to avoid using the term salafi to describe ourselves. 

&lt;strong&gt;Shaykh Yasir&lt;/strong&gt;, can you please clarify?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you the shaykh&#8217;s secretary akhi?</p>
<p>I hope what you are saying isn&#8217;t true, that he avoids using the word &#8220;salafi&#8221; because it has a negative connotation to some people. The word &#8220;Muslim&#8221; has a negative connotation to some people as well, are we also going to avoid using it? If people have misconceptions about something, we clear out those misconceptions for them, not change who we are because of a misconception.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you have misunderstood Shaykh Yasir because I don&#8217;t think that he calls for us to avoid using the term salafi to describe ourselves. </p>
<p><strong>Shaykh Yasir</strong>, can you please clarify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AsimG</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59567</link>
		<dc:creator>AsimG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59567</guid>
		<description>Wahabi is a deplorable term and completely avoided and salafi has so many negative connotations that this is also avoided.

Sh. Yasir uses the term &quot;orthodox&quot; Muslim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wahabi is a deplorable term and completely avoided and salafi has so many negative connotations that this is also avoided.</p>
<p>Sh. Yasir uses the term &#8220;orthodox&#8221; Muslim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abd- Allah</title>
		<link>http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59564</link>
		<dc:creator>Abd- Allah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 06:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://muslimmatters.org/2007/04/01/the-wahhabi-myth-debunking-the-bogeyman/#comment-59564</guid>
		<description>Shaykh Yasir, can you please clarify which of the terms is the one that you avoid? Is it the term &quot;wahhabi&quot; or the term &quot;salafi&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaykh Yasir, can you please clarify which of the terms is the one that you avoid? Is it the term &#8220;wahhabi&#8221; or the term &#8220;salafi&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

